Acceptability and feasibility of maternal screening for Group B Streptococcus: a rapid review.
Constantinou, G.; Webb, R.; Ayers, S.; Mitchell, E. J.; Daniels, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe risks and benefits of maternal screening for GBS during pregnancy or the intrapartum period are widely debated, since screen positive results trigger prophylactic antibiotic use. There is little known about womens and health professionals views regarding GBS screening. ObjectivesTo conduct a rapid review to synthesise evidence on women and health professionals: (1) knowledge and awareness of; (2) preferences for; and (3) acceptability of GBS screening programmes, and (4) how feasible they are to implement. MethodLiterature searches were conducted using online databases from their inception to 2023. Papers were included if they reported primary research from the perspectives of health professionals and women, about their knowledge and awareness, preferences, acceptability and feasibility of different types of GBS screening programmes. Data were assessed for confidence using GRADE- CERQual and analysed using a convergent synthesis approach. Findings42 papers were eligible for inclusion. A total of 16,306 women and professionals were included. Women generally did not have extensive knowledge about GBS. Health professionals had a higher level of knowledge than women. Women were generally (but not universally) positive about GBS testing procedures. Some women were concerned about the impact on their place of birth. Discussion and ConclusionWhere GBS screening programmes are available, parents must be provided with high quality information about them. Health professionals and service managers need to weigh up the benefits and risks of screening for GBS with local feasibility and treatment options, and with womens individual values and birth plans. Statement of significanceProblem: Maternal GBS colonisation at birth can lead to invasive GBS disease. The risks and benefits of screening for GBS during pregnancy is widely debated. What is already known: Different countries use different GBS screening strategies, such as the universal screening strategy vs risk based. What this paper adds: The World Health Organization reviewed their GBS policy guidelines in 2024. Results from this paper were used to ensure women and health professionals views were considered. This paper found that women are generally (but not universally) positive about GBS testing procedures with some concerned about the impact on their birth choices.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 96%
- Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units 95%
- Mapping factors that may influence attrition and retention of midwives: a scoping review protocol 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- What are the mechanisms of effect of group antenatal care? A systematic realist review and synthesis of the literature 95%
- Giving birth in a Pandemic: Women’s Birth Experiences in England during COVID-19 94%
- Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey among women in Switzerland 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population birth outcomes in 2020 and experiences of expectant mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a ‘Born in Wales’ mixed methods study using routine data 95%
- Identification and Mitigation of High-Risk Pregnancy with the Community Maternal Danger Score Mobile Application in Gboko, Nigeria 95%
- Adoption of policies to improve respectful maternity care in Timor-Leste 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge of Female Genital Cutting among health and social care professionals in Francophone Belgium: A cross-sectional survey 96%
- “ She helped from the first minute to the last ” – experiences of respectful maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nampula Province, Mozambique 95%
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.