Back

Inexperienced bumble bees are poor at securely landing regardless of flower orientation or presence of labellum

McWaters, S. R.; Popp, S.; Rivera, M. D.; Mendoza, F.; Dornhaus, A.

2024-07-02 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2024.06.27.601070 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The mutualism between bees and flowers creates strong selection on both the structure of the flower and behavior of the bee to maximize pollination and foraging success, respectively. Previous research has primarily assessed the costs of foraging by quantifying the time and accuracy of search, and handling time of the flower. However, there is little attention given to the actual success of landing, and it is often not explicitly stated whether failed landing attempts are taken into consideration. We show here that landing attempts often are unsuccessful, especially in inexperienced bees. Orientation of artificial flowers in our experiment neither influenced the preference nor landing success of a naive bumble bee forager. The presence of a labellum, often considered to serve as a landing platform, also did not influence landing success, indicating that it may mostly play a role in flower recognition or act as a nectar guide. Failed landing attempts may thus play an under-recognized role in the foraging efficiency and behavior of bees, and learning may be key in individual bee landing efficiency, not just flower recognition. Further research should aim to quantify the costs of landing failures and consider the role of experience in individual bee landing success.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.9%
3
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
6
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
9
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
11
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
12
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
13
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
16
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
Journal of Insect Physiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Animal Cognition
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Insect Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%