Back

Deciphering BRCAness Phenotype in Cancer: A Graph Convolutional Neural Network Approach with Layer-wise Relevance Propagation Analysis

Yang, J.; Chereda, H.; Dönitz, J.; Bleckmann, A.; Beissbarth, T.

2024-08-12 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.06.26.600328 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCancer variability among patients underscores the need for personalized therapy based on genomic understanding. BRCAness, characterized by vulnerabilities similar to BRCA mutations, particularly in homologous recombination repair, shows potential sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents like PARP inhibitors, highlighting its clinical significance. MethodsWe employed Graph Convolutional Neural Networks (GCNNs) with Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP) to analyze gene expression data from the TCGA Pan-Cancer dataset. The study compared the efficacy of GCNNs against traditional machine learning models and differential gene expression analysis, focusing on their ability to elucidate complex genomic interactions defining BRCAness. ResultsDifferential Gene Expression (DGE) analysis proved limited in capturing the nuances of BRCAness. In contrast, GLRP significantly identified genes related to transcription regulation and cancer processes, emphasizing the phenotypes complexity. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) highlighted crucial pathways like Nuclear Receptors signaling, Cellular Senescence, and ESR-mediated signaling, underscoring their roles in BRCAness and therapeutic potential. ConclusionGLRP outperformed traditional approaches in analyzing BRCAness, providing deep insights into transcriptional and oncogenic processes critical to the BRCAness phenotype. Our findings suggest new directions for developing targeted and personalized cancer treatments, leveraging intricate molecular interactions associated with BRCAness.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.