Evaluation of the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS in PSA-positive patients
Li, X.; Ge, Z.; Yang, Q.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, H.; Sun, C.; Chen, W.; Li, Y.; Lin, S.; Zhang, P.; Wang, W.; Chen, S.; Li, W.; Tao, L.; Huang, R.; Ni, L.; Lai, Y.
Show abstract
BackgroundProstate cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors and poses a substantial threat to human health. PSA or enhanced MRI is widely used in prostate cancer screening or diagnosis. However, false-positive results of PSA or enhanced MRI will lead to unnecessary puncture biopsy, and patients will have to bear the adverse consequences of mental pain, expensive examination costs, and examination injuries; whereas false-negative results of PSA or enhanced MRI will lead to delayed treatment, and patients will have to bear the adverse consequences of poor prognosis, expensive treatment costs, poor quality of life, and short survival period. There is an urgent need to find convenient, economical and non-invasive diagnostic methods to reduce the PSA or enhanced MRI false-negative and false-positive rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie-SS and YiDiXie-HS in prostate cancer. Patients and methodsThe study finally included 464 subjects with positive PSA test (prostate cancer group, n=292; BPH group, n=172). Remaining serum samples from the subjects were collected and tested with YiDiXie all-cancer detection kit. The sensitivity and specificity of YiDiXie-SS and YiDiXie-HS were evaluated respectively. ResultsThe sensitivity of YiDiXie-SS was 100% (95% CI: 98.7% - 100%; 292/292) and its specificity was 60.5% (95% CI: 53.0% - 67.5%; 104/172). As shown in Table 3, the sensitivity of YiDiXie-HS was 93.8% (95% CI: 90.5% - 96.1%; 274/292) and its specificity was 86.0% (95% CI: 80.1% - 90.4%; 148/172). The sensitivity of YiDiXie-SS in PSA-positive patients was 100% (95% CI: 98.6% - 100%; 279/279), and the specificity was 58.0% (95% CI: 49.8% - 65.2%; 90/ 156). This means that the application of YiDiXie-SS reduces the PSA false-positive rate by 58.0% (95% CI: 49.8% - 65.2%; 90/156) with essentially no increase in malignancy leakage. The sensitivity of YiDiXie-HS in PSA-negative patients was 92.3% (95% CI: 66.7% - 99.6%; 12/13), and the specificity was 81.3% (95% CI: 57.0% - 93.4%; 13/ 16). This means that the application of YiDiXie-HS reduced the PSA false negative rate by 92.3% (95% CI: 66.7% - 99.6%; 12/13). YiDiXie-SS had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 97.6% - 100%; 159/159) and a specificity of 59.6% (95% CI: 49.5% - 68.9%; 56/94) in enhanced MRI-positive patients. This means that the application of YiDiXie-SS reduces the false-positive rate of enhanced MRI by 59.6% (95% CI: 49.5% - 68.9%; 56/94) with essentially no increase in malignancy leakage. the sensitivity of YiDiXie-HS in enhanced MRI-negative patients was 90.2% (95% CI: 79.0% - 95.7%; 46/51), and the specificity was 83.3% (95% CI: 55.2% - 97.0%; 10/12). This means that the application of YiDiXie-HS reduced the false negative rate of enhanced MRI by 90.2% (95% CI: 79.0% - 95.7%; 46/51). O_TBL View this table: org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11a3a26org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@dfb213org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@24332forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9c6e6eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15f918_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_TBL O_FLOATNOTable 3.C_FLOATNO O_TABLECAPTIONThe performance of YiDiXie-HS C_TABLECAPTION C_TBL ConclusionYiDiXie-SS significantly reduces the false-positive rate of PSA or enhanced MRI-positive patients without increasing the number of under-diagnosed malignant tumors. YiDiXie-HS significantly reduces the false-negative rate of PSA or enhanced MRI-negative patients. YiDiXie-SS and YiDiXie-HS can play an important role in prostate cancer, and are expected to solve the problem of "high false-positive rate of PSA or enhanced MRI" and "high false-negative rate of PSA or enhanced MRI". Clinical trial numberChiCTR2200066840.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive analysis of prostate cancer life expectancy, loss of life expectancy, and healthcare expenditures: Taiwan national cohort study spanning 2008 to 2019 95%
- Glycoprofiling of proteins as prostate cancer biomarkers: a multinational population study 95%
- Intraoperative calculus or hemorrhage in transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy as a risk factor for recurrent hemospermia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automatic detection of pituitary microadenoma from magnetic resonance imaging using deep learning algorithms 92%
- TissueGrinder, a novel technology for rapid generation of patient-derived single cell suspensions from solid tumors by mechanical tissue dissociation 90%
- A population-level analysis of the protective effects of androgen deprivation therapy against COVID-19 disease incidence and severity 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection, Isolation and Quantification of Myocardial Infarct with Four Different Histological Staining Techniques 90%
- Analytical performance of a highly sensitive system to detect gene variants using next-generation sequencing for lung cancer companion diagnostics 90%
- Demarcation line determination for diagnosis of gastric cancer disease range using unsupervised machine learning in magnifying narrow-band imaging 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Loss of HOXB13 expression in neuroendocrine prostate cancer 94%
- Accurate prognosis for localized prostate cancer through coherent voting networks and multi-omic data 93%
- Real-time, functional intra-operative localization of rat cavernous nerve network using near-infrared cyanine voltage-sensitive dye imaging 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Retrospective Validation of an Artificial Intelligence System for Diagnostic Assessment of Prostate Biopsies on the ProMort Cohort: Study Protocol 95%
- Protocol summary and statistical analysis plan for the randomized trial of early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (ProScreen) 92%
- The Effects of Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients with Hip fracture: a study protocol for randomized, parallel controlled, double-blind trial 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.