Back

Capturing the implications of residential segregation for the dynamics of infectious disease transmission

Zelner, J.; Stone, D.; Eisenberg, M.; Brouwer, A.; Sakrejda, K.

2024-06-26 infectious diseases
10.1101/2024.06.26.24309541 medRxiv
Show abstract

Occupational and residential segregation and other manifestations of social and economic inequity drive of racial and socioeconomic inequities in infection, severe disease, and death from a wide variety of infections including SARS-CoV-2, influenza, HIV, tuberculosis, and many others. Despite a deep and long-standing quantitative and qualitative literature on infectious disease inequity, mathematical models that give equally serious attention to the social and biological dynamics underlying infection inequity remain rare. In this paper, we develop a simple transmission model that accounts for the mechanistic relationship between residential segregation on inequity in infection outcomes. We conceptualize segregation as a high-level, fundamental social cause of infection inequity that impacts both who-contacts-whom (separation or preferential mixing) as well as the risk of infection upon exposure (vulnerability). We show that the basic reproduction number, [R]0, and epidemic dynamics are sensitive to the interaction between these factors. Specifically, our analytical and simulation results and that separation alone is insufficient to explain segregation-associated differences in infection risks, and that increasing separation only results in the concentration of risk in segregated populations when it is accompanied by increasing vulnerability. Overall, this work shows why it is important to carefully consider the causal linkages and correlations between high-level social determinants - like segregation - and more-proximal transmission mechanisms when either crafting or evaluating public health policies. While the framework applied in this analysis is deliberately simple, it lays the groundwork for future, data-driven explorations of the mechanistic impact of residential segregation on infection inequities.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
2
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
3
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.3%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
6
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.8%
9
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
10
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.2%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.0%
12
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
14
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
17
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
19
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
20
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%