Back

BioRSP: a method for characterizing enrichment patterns in single-cell embeddings

Yao, Z.; Chen, J. Y.

2025-12-29 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.06.25.599250 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Low-dimensional embeddings such as UMAP and t-SNE are routinely used to visually interpret high-dimensional omics data, yet claims based on embedding geometry are often qualitative, embedding-sensitive, and weakly calibrated. We present BioRSP (Biological Radar Scanning Plots), a geometry-first framework that quantifies how a user-defined foreground subset is distributed across the embedding footprint of a fixed analysis set. BioRSP converts 2D coordinates to polar form around a robust vantage point, scans the set by angle, and computes a radar profile that summarizes signed radial enrichment of foreground relative to background within sliding angular windows using a distance-based radial discrepancy. The profile is reduced to interpretable summaries including anisotropy magnitude, peak directionality, and coverage, and is accompanied by explicit adequacy rules and subsampling-based stability diagnostics so the method can abstain when the geometry is underpowered. We demonstrate BioRSP in a community-standard human kidney single-nucleus reference by analyzing thick ascending limb (TAL) nuclei using published UMAP coordinates and a standardized within-set top-decile foreground rule. Within TAL, BioRSP distinguishes sharply localized rim-enrichment patterns, broadly supported but structured within-type heterogeneity, and near-isotropic profiles, with anisotropy spanning more than an order of magnitude in the pooled TAL analysis. Donor-aware reruns show that per-donor adequacy is frequently limiting, but that directional profiles are stable when donor-level support is sufficient. BioRSP is provided as open-source software producing standardized plots, summary tables, and run manifests to support reproducible embedding-aligned enrichment analysis.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.