Use of the EsoGuard(R) Molecular Biomarker Test in Non-Endoscopic Detection of Barrett's Esophagus among High-Risk Individuals in a Screening Population
Shaheen, N.; Othman, M.; Taunk, J.; Chang, K. J.; Jaganmohan, S.; Yachimski, P. S.; Fang, J. C.; Spataro, J. S.; Verma, S.; Lee, V. T.; deGuzman, B. J.; Aklog, L.
Show abstract
Background and AimsBarretts Esophagus (BE) is the precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). We aimed to assess performance, safety, and tolerability of the EsoGuard (EG) assay on samples collected non-endoscopically with the EsoCheck (EC) device (EG/EC) for BE detection in the intended-use population, meeting American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) guideline criteria (chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and 3+ additional risk factors). MethodsWe performed a prospective, multicenter study (NCT04293458) to assess EG performance (primary endpoint) on cells collected with EC, for detection of BE and EAC using esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and biopsies as the comparator. Twenty-four sites across the U.S. and Spain participated. EC safety and usability were assessed as secondary endpoints. Results180 male subjects aged >50 years with chronic GERD met eligibility criteria, of which 163 (90.6%) had EGD and successful EC administration. Mean age was 60.5yrs, 34.4% were obese, 56.7% had tobacco history, and 3.9% had a 1st degree relative with BE or EAC. Of 122 samples analyzed, 93 contributed to the primary endpoint analysis. About 9% of subjects in the Primary Analysis Population had BE on EGD, none with dysplasia. Sensitivity of EG for BE was 87.5% (95% CI 47.4-99.7), specificity was 81.2% (95% CI 71.2-88.8), positive predictive value was 30.4% (95% CI 13.2-52.9), and negative predictive value was 98.6% (95% CI 92.3-99.96). Mild esophageal abrasions were observed in 1.5%; no serious adverse events were reported. ConclusionsEG/EC appears effective for BE screening. This approach provides a safe, accurate, and well-tolerated non-endoscopic alternative in high-risk patients.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-endoscopic screening for Barrett’s esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in at risk Veterans 98%
- Nonendoscopic Detection Of Barrett’S Esophagus In Patients Without Gerd Symptoms 97%
- Normative values for body surface gastric mapping evaluations of gastric motility using Gastric Alimetry: spectral analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Barrett's esophagus is the precursor of all esophageal adenocarcinomas 93%
- Multi-centre derivation and validation of a colitis-associated colorectal cancer risk prediction web-tool 92%
- Histopathologist Features Predictive of Diagnostic Concordance at Expert Level Amongst a Large International Sample of Pathologists Diagnosing Barrett′s Dysplasia Using Digital Pathology 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct subgroups in gastroparesis defined by simultaneous body surface gastric mapping and gastric emptying breath testing 93%
- A standardized system and App for continuous patient symptom logging in gastroduodenal disorders: design, implementation, and validation 92%
- Neuropathic Gastroduodenal Disorders can be Diagnosed by Non-Invasive Body Surface Gastric Mapping: a Comparison with Antroduodenal Manometry 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nasogastric tube in critical care setting: combining ETCO2 and pH measuring to confirm correct placement 91%
- Renalase is a novel tissue and serological biomarker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 90%
- The safety and efficacy of remimazolam tosylate combined with propofol in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preclinical and clinical validation of a novel injected molded swab for molecular assay detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus 88%
- Deep learning models for poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma classification in whole slide images using transfer learning 86%
- Accuracy of the diagnostic tests for the detection of Chagas disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.