Back

Automatic radiotherapy treatment planning with deep functional reinforcement learning

Liu, B.; Liu, Y.; Li, Z.; Xiao, J.; Lin, H.

2024-06-24 health informatics
10.1101/2024.06.23.24309060 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and purposeIntensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is a crucial radiotherapy technique, often formulated as an optimization problem. However, when the constraints are too tight to provide a feasible solution, human planners resort to relaxing the optimization parameters and re-evaluating until an acceptable solution is obtained. This process is laborious and time-consuming which has prompted attempts to automate radiotherapy through inverse planning studies using reinforcement learning. Unfortunately, these studies face two major limitations. Firstly, a separate sub-network must be designed for each organ, rendering them difficult to apply to patients with an inconsistent number of structures. Secondly, the low signal-to-noise inputs and discrete action space result in low training efficiency. To address these limitations, this study proposes a novel and effective model. MethodsThis study proposes an organ-sharing network called Functional automatic treatment PlannI ng Network (FatPIN), which contains a functional embedding layer to extract curve features of the dose-volume histogram (DVH). It outputs continuous actions that adjust the optimization parameters, thereby automating the radiotherapy planning process. ResultsExperiments were conducted on the cervical cancer dataset and the results show that the FatPIN is feasible and effective in real-world radiotherapy. With automatic iteration, FatPIN gradually increased the PTV dose, while reducing the dose levels of the OARs. Specifically, at step 50, the D95 of the PTV reached 51.68 Gy, exceeding the clinical standard of 50.40 Gy, the V30, V40 and V50 of all OARs were within clinical requirements. ConclusionWe proposed FatPIN to implement automatic radiotherapy treatment planning. Experimental assessments conducted on cases of cervical cancer demonstrate significant improvements in patient metrics facilitated by FatPIN, thus confirming its practical applicability in clinical contexts.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.