Back

Nanoparticles co-delivering siRNA and mRNA for simultaneous restoration and silencing of gene/protein expression in vitro and invivo

Manturthi, S.; El-Sahli, S.; Bo, Y.; Durocher, E.; Kirkby, M.; Popatia, A.; Mediratta, K.; Daniel, R.; Lee, S.- H.; Iqbal, U.; Cote, M.; Wang, L.; Gadde, S.

2024-06-27 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.06.22.600196 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RNA-based agents such as siRNA, miRNA, and mRNA can selectively manipulate gene expression/proteins and have the potential to revolutionize the current therapeutic strategies for various diseases, including cancer. To address the poor stability and inherent limitations of RNA agents, nanoparticle (NP) platforms have been developed to deliver functional mRNA or siRNA inside the cells. Recent studies have focused on either siRNA to knock down proteins causing drug resistance or mRNA technology to introduce tumor suppressors. However, complex diseases like cancer need multi-targeted approaches to selectively target multiple gene expressions/proteins. In this proof-of-concept study, we developed co-delivery nanoparticles containing Luc-mRNA and siRNA-GFP as model RNA agents ((M+S)-NPs) and assessed their effects in vitro and in vivo. Our studies show that NPs can effectively deliver both functional mRNA and siRNA together, simultaneously impacting the expression of two genes/proteins in vitro. Additionally, after in vivo administration, co-delivery NPs successfully knocked down GFP while introducing luciferase in a TNBC mouse model, indicating our NPs have the potential to develop RNA-based anticancer therapeutics. These studies pave the way to develop RNA-based, multitargeted, multi-delivery approaches for complex diseases like cancer. TOC O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=90 SRC="FIGDIR/small/600196v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (37K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1668ae2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1283491org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9336daorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f654c5_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.