HARMONY (HARM reduction for Opiates, Nicotine and You) Trial: Protocol of a Randomised Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of Vaporised Nicotine Products for Tobacco Smoking Cessation amongst NSW Opiate Agonist Treatment Clients
Bonevski, B.; Jackson, M. A.; Austin, E.; Lintzeris, N.; Ezard, N.; Gartner, C.; Oldmeadow, C.; Haber, P.; Hallinan, R.; Rodgers, C.; Ho, T.; Harrod, M.; Dunlop, A. J.
Show abstract
IntroductionTobacco smoking is a major cause of preventable disease in Australia. Individuals receiving opiate agonist treatment (OAT) are a group who experience high tobacco-related morbidity and mortality rates. Despite reporting a desire to stop, relapse rates in OAT clients are high and cessation attempts supported by pharmacotherapy are less effective than in general populations. New and innovative ways of addressing smoking amongst this group are needed. Vaporised nicotine products (VNPs), or e-cigarettes, may reduce a persons exposure to toxicants and carcinogens when compared to tobacco cigarettes. High quality evidence indicates that VNPs can increase rates of smoking cessation compared to nicotine replacement therapy. Pilot results of VNPs as a smoking cessation aid in OAT clients suggests their use is feasible and acceptable but effectiveness in this group has not been explored. This protocol details the rationale and methodology for a randomised controlled trial to examine the effectiveness of VNPs for tobacco smoking cessation amongst OAT clients in New South Wales, Australia. Methods and AnalysisThis will be a randomised single-blinded parallel group trial comparing 12-weeks of 12mg/mL vaporised nicotine to best-practice NRT. Participants must be 18 years or older, accessing opiate treatment at a participating health site, and a current daily tobacco smoker seeking to quit or reduce their smoking. The primary outcome will be self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence from tobacco after 12-weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes include biochemically verified abstinence, self-reported 30-day abstinence, number of cigarettes smoked each day, craving and withdrawal symptoms, and VNP safety. Between-group comparisons will be conducted at end of treatment, and at 12-weeks post-treatment. DiscussionThis study examines new ways of reducing tobacco related harm in individuals receiving OAT. Outcomes may be enhanced by leveraging participants interactions with health care provides who can facilitate the required support. Study findings have the potential to significantly impact tobacco smoking prevalence in priority populations. Ethics and DisseminationProtocol approval was granted by Hunter New England Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference 2020/ETH01866). Findings will be disseminated via academic conferences, peer-reviewed publications and social media. RegistrationThe study was registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Reference ACTRN12621000148875).
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A large Australian longitudinal cohort registry demonstrates sustained safety and efficacy of oral medicinal cannabis for at least two years 95%
- The effects of reduced nicotine content cigarettes in smokers with mood or anxiety disorders: a double-blind randomized trial 95%
- Tobacco, nicotine, and cannabis use and exposure in an Australian Indigenous population during pregnancy: A protocol to measure parental and foetal exposure and outcomes 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- WITHDRAWN: Comparative effectiveness of extended release naltrexone and sublingual buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder among Medicaid patients 94%
- Transitions from smoking to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use, or stopping nicotine use in ALSPAC and their association with modifiable and sociodemographic factors 93%
- The changing face of nicotine use in England: age-specific annual trends, 2014-2024 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Data management in substance use disorder treatment research: Implications from data harmonization of National Institute on Drug Abuse-funded randomized controlled trials 93%
- Evidence Supporting EMA Drug Approvals (2020-2023): A Cross-Sectional Study of Trial Design and Outcomes 89%
- Assessing the potential for prevention or earlier detection of on-site monitoring findings from randomised controlled trials: further analyses of findings from the prospective TEMPER triggered monitoring study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fentanyl, Heroin, and Methamphetamine-Based Counterfeit Pills Sold at Tourist-Oriented Pharmacies in Mexico: An Ethnographic and Drug Checking Study 93%
- Changes in injecting versus smoking heroin, fentanyl, and methamphetamine among people who inject drugs in San Diego, California, 2020 to 2023 92%
- LIBR Methamphetamine and Opioid Cue Database (LIBR MOCD): Development and Validation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A factorial randomised controlled trial to examine the potential effect of a text-message based intervention on reducing adolescent susceptibility to e-cigarette use: A study protocol 96%
- Changes in Cardiovascular Disease Risk, Lung Function, and Other Clinical Health Outcomes When People Who Smoke Use E-cigarettes to Reduce Cigarette Smoking: An Exploratory Analysis from a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial 94%
- E-cigarette use and combustible tobacco cigarette smoking uptake among non-smokers, including relapse in former smokers: umbrella review, systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.