Back

ACE2 decoy Fc-fusions and bi-specific killer engager (BiKEs) require Fc engagement for in vivo efficacy against SARS-CoV-2

Dick, J. K.; Hicks, D.; Krishna, V. D.; Sangala, J. A.; Zandstra, B. T.; Baehr, C.; Verbeek, J. S.; Cragg, M. S.; Cheeran, M. C.-J.; Pravetoni, M.; Hart, G. T.

2024-06-21 immunology
10.1101/2024.06.20.599956 bioRxiv
Show abstract

SARS-CoV-2 virus has continued to evolve over time necessitating the adaptation of vaccines to maintain efficacy. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 were a key line of defense for unvaccinated or immunocompromised individuals. However, these mAbs are now ineffective against current SARS-CoV-2 variants. Here, we tested three aspects of SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics. First, we tested whether Fc engagement is necessary for in vivo clearance of SARS-CoV-2. Secondly, we tested bi-specific killer engagers (BiKEs) that simultaneously engage SARS-CoV-2 and a specific Fc receptor. Benefits of these engagers include the ease of manufacturing, stability, more cell-specific targeting, and high affinity binding to Fc receptors. Using both mAbs and BiKEs, we found that both neutralization and Fc receptor engagement were necessary for effective SARS-CoV-2 clearance. Thirdly, due to ACE2 being necessary for viral entry, ACE2 will maintain binding to SARS-CoV-2 despite viral evolution. Therefore, we used an ACE2 decoy Fc-fusion or BiKE, instead of an anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody sequence, as a potential therapeutic that would withstand viral evolution. We found that the ACE2 decoy approach also required Fc receptor engagement and, unlike traditional neutralizing antibodies against specific variants, enabled the clearance of two distinct SARS-CoV-2 variants. These data show the importance of Fc engagement for mAbs, the utility of BiKEs as therapies for infectious disease, and the in vivo effectiveness of the ACE2 decoy approach. With further studies, we predict combining neutralization, the cellular response, and this ACE2 decoy approach will benefit individuals with ineffective antibody levels. AbbreviationsACE2, scFv, mAb, BiKE, COVID-19, Fc, CD16, CD32b, CD64, d.p.i Key pointsO_LIWith equal dosing, both neutralization and Fc engagement are necessary for the optimal efficacy of in vivo antibodies and bi-specific killer engagers (BiKEs) against SARS-CoV-2. C_LIO_LIBiKEs can clear SARS-CoV-2 virus and protect against severe infection in the hACE2-K18 mouse model. C_LIO_LIACE2 decoys as part of Fc-fusions or BiKEs provide in vivo clearance of two disparate SARS-CoV-2 variants. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.3%
3
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
4
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
6
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
7
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 18%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
10
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.9%
11
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
15
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.0%
18
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
mAbs
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
27
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
29
Vaccine: X
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%