Back

Fluorescence Anisotropy Analysis of the Interaction between Doxorubicin and DNA Origami Nanostructures

Lisitsyna, E. S.; Klose, A.; Vuorimaa-Laukkanen, E.; Ijäs, H.; Lajunen, T.; Suhling, K.; Linko, V.; Laaksonen, T.

2024-06-20 biochemistry
10.1101/2024.06.20.599777 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Owing to doxorubicins high DNA binding affinity, doxorubicin-loaded DNA origami nanostructures (DOX-DONs) are promising nanocarriers against cancer. However, understanding the interactions between doxorubicin (DOX) and DNA origami nanostructures (DONs) is important to ensure the quality of DOX-DONs. This interaction is often taken for granted and the influence of DOX loading conditions is poorly characterized. Exploiting the inherent fluorescence of DOX, steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy spectroscopy techniques are used for characterizing non-destructively the binding between DOX and DONs, and the purity of formed complexes. The difference in fluorescence anisotropy between free DOX and DOX-DONs confirms the DOX-DON complex formation. Further, at loading ratios of DOX to DNA base pairs > 0.5, homo-Forster resonance energy transfer (homo-FRET) between closely packed DOX molecules is observed. Moreover, time-resolved anisotropy reveals DOX aggregation on DONs at high loading ratios > 1. For loading ratios > 0.1, spin-filtration to remove excess free DOX is efficient and necessary, though at loading ratios > 1 some DOX aggregates remain attached to the DONs. In summary, fluorescence anisotropy analysis provides more detailed information and insight into DOX-DONs compared to regularly used fluorescence intensity-based characterization methods, and these results can help designing more efficient and safer DNA intercalator-based nanocarriers.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.