The BRoccoli In Osteoarthritis (BRIO study) - A randomised controlled feasibility trial to examine the potential protective effect of broccoli bioactives, (specifically sulforaphane), on osteoarthritis.
Davidson, R. K.; Watts, L.; Beasy, G.; Saha, s.; Kroon, P.; Cassidy, A.; Clark, A.; Fraser, W.; Mcnamara, I.; Kingsbury, S. R.; Conaghan, P. G.; Clark, I. M.; MacGregor, A. J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe Broccoli in Osteoarthritis (BRIO Study) was conducted to determine whether dietary sulforaphane (SFN), consumed as broccoli, improves pain and/or physical function in participants with knee osteoarthritis (OA). This was a proof of principle study to test the feasibility of the trial to optimise the design of an appropriately powered study. DesignTwo-centre, double-blind, two-arm parallel, randomised placebo-controlled, dietary intervention feasibility trial. Patients with radiographic knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence score 2-3), with pain of at least 4 on a scale of 0-10 were recruited. The intervention was a high glucoraphanin broccoli, (source of SFN), or a matched placebo (no SFN) soup. Pain and measures of physical function were measured at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks. ResultsThe mean WOMAC pain score (scale 0 - 20) was decreased by 4.2 (95% CI: 1.03,7.38) following intervention, Similar patterns of improvement were observed for other pain and function outcome measures. Study data, sample collections and intervention adherence were 100% compliant except where COVID restrictions applied. Acceptability for randomisation was 100% and acceptability for the intervention was 92%. There were three related adverse events, two of which were expected. ConclusionsHigh glucosinolate broccoli soup is a novel approach to managing OA that is widely accessible and can be used on a large scale. This study shows that it is an acceptable way of delivering dietary bioactives and has potential for therapeutic benefit. The primary outcome of pain improved in the intervention group compared to the placebo and the confidence interval encompassed the minimal clinically important difference. The data provide justification for proceeding to a large scale, appropriately powered intervention trial.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Beneficial effects of colchicine for moderate to severe COVID-19: an interim analysis of a randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled clinical trial 91%
- Risk-stratified monitoring for sulfasalazine toxicity: prognostic model development and validation. 89%
- Biologic agents for rheumatic diseases in the break of COVID-19: friend or foe? 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can a specific biobehavioral based therapeutic education program lead to changes in pain perception and brain plasticity biomarkers in chronic pain patients? A study protocol for a randomized clinical trial 93%
- Acceptability of a nurse-led non-pharmacological complex intervention for knee pain: Nurse and patient views and experiences 92%
- Perceived facilitators and barriers among physical therapists and orthopedic surgeons to pre-operative home-based exercise with one exercise-only in patients with severe knee osteoarthritis: A qualitative interview study nested in the QUADX-1 trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical And Cost-Effectiveness Of A Personalised Guided Consultation Versus Usual Physiotherapy Care In People Presenting With Shoulder Pain: A Protocol For The Panda-S Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial And Process Evaluation 94%
- Exploring Risk Factors for Comorbid Depression in Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
- Effects of 12 weeks of Multi-nutrient supplementation on the Immune and Musculoskeletal systems of Older Adults in Aged-Care (The Pomerium Study): Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Versus Arthritis Musculoskeletal Disorders Research Advisory Group Priority Setting Exercise Protocol 92%
- Incidence and management of inflammatory arthritis in England before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-level cohort study using OpenSAFELY 91%
- Gout and coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): the risk of diagnosis and death in the UK Biobank 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prospective Registration of Trials: Where we are, why, and how we could get better 93%
- Clinical Trials in COVID-19 Management & Prevention: A Meta-epidemiological Study examining methodological quality 91%
- Results reporting for clinical trials led by medical universities and university hospitals in the Nordic countries was often missing or delayed 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.