Back

A naturalistic study of the efficacy and acceptability of rTMS in treating major depressive disorder in Australian youth.

Miljevic, A.; Hoath, K.; Leggett, K. S.; Hennessy, L. A.; Boax, C. A.; Hryniewicki, J.; Rodger, J.

2024-06-30 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2024.06.20.24309219 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective, evidence-based treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) and is publicly funded in Australia. However, there is no published data to date concerning its use in private TMS service provider clinics in Australia. There is further limited data as to its efficacy and safety in treating MDD in youth populations. MethodsThis retrospective study examined routinely collected data of 46 outpatients aged 17 to 25 years old, who received rTMS treatment for MDD in a private TMS clinic. Primary outcomes measures were the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the depression subscale of the 21-item Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Secondary measures included the anxiety and stress sub-scales of the DASS-21, a measure of Quality of Life (QoL) Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire, and the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ). ResultsA 4-7-week course of rTMS significantly reduce symptoms of self-reported depression (42.5% response) and clinician-assessed depression (40.7% response). Both anxiety and stress significantly reduced across the course of rTMS treatment and significant improvements to QoL and self-reported cognition were observed. Reported side effects following rTMS in youth included a mild headache and fatigue. ConclusionsThe findings of this naturalistic study suggest that an acute course of rTMS provided in private clinical settings is safe and effective - resulting in similar response rates in youth patients as reported in adult patients. In real world practice, rTMS proves to be a well-tolerated and highly effective intervention for MDD in youth, across diverse clinical settings. Implications and ContributionThe findings of this naturalistic study suggest that in real world practice, rTMS proves to be a well-tolerated and highly effective intervention for treating depression and anxiety in youth (17-25-year-olds), with additional benefits to cognitive symptoms of depression and overall well-being.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
4
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
5
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
6
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
8
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
9
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
10
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
11
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
12
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
14
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Journal of Psychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Psychopharmacology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
20
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
24
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%
29
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%