Impact of Atrial Fibrillation with Rapid Ventricular Response in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
Halhal, B.; Bar, O.; Mohammad, S.; Aronson, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundRapid atrial fibrillation (AF) is considered to be a trigger for heart failure (HF) decompensation. Few data are available on AF (particularly with a rapid ventricular response) as a trigger for HF decompensation and its effect on clinical outcomes. MethodsWe studied 11,446 patients with acute HF. Rapid AF at admission was defined as ventricular rate [≥]110 beats per minute, present at the first ECG performed after hospital arrival. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. ResultsRapid AF (defined as ventricular rate [≥] 110 beats per minute) at admission was present in 609 patients (5.3%). In-hospital mortality occurred in 83 (13.6%) and 951 (8.8%) patients with and without rapid AF, respectively. In a multivariable Cox regression model, the HR for in-hospital mortality was 1.50 (95% 1.16 to 1.93, P<0.0001). With further adjustment for heart rate, the effect of rapid AF on in-hospital mortality was no longer significant (HR 1.11; 95% CI 0.83-1.50, P=0.48). From the original cohort, 419 participants with rapid AF in admission were matched on their propensity score to 419 patients with sinus tachycardia. In-hospital mortality occurred in 62 (14.8%) and 61 (14.6%) patients with and without rapid AF, respectively. Compared with the sinus tachycardia group, the HR for the in-hospital mortality in patients with rapid AF was 0.98 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.42; P=0.93). ConclusionRapid AF in ADHF patients is associated with increased mortality risk that is mediated predominantly by rapid ventricular rate. The magnitude of the AF effect is similar to that of sinus tachycardia, indicating that the underlying mechanism for the adverse outcome is not directly related to AF.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prognostic value of compact myocardial thinning in patients with left ventricular non-compaction 96%
- Atrial functional substrates for the prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation 96%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of the Impact of Procedural and Pharmacological Interventions on Deep Learning-based Electrocardiographic Markers of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism Reduces Atrial Arrhythmias Post-Cardiac Surgery and Attenuates Atrial Stress Responses to Cardioplegic Arrest 95%
- Prognostic Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Predicting Long-term Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) 95%
- The Effect of Medical Therapy on Reducing the Risk of Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Competing Risks in Patients with Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverters Defibrillators: Global Electrical Heterogeneity and Clinical Outcomes (GEHCO) Study 97%
- High Initial Heart Rate Score is an Independent Predictor of New Atrial High-Rate Episodes in Pacemaker Patients with Sinus Node Dysfunction 95%
- Procedural Volume and Outcomes with Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Report from the NCDR AFib Ablation Registry 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Arrhythmia and Survival Outcomes among Black and White Patients with a Primary Prevention Defibrillator 97%
- Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in Older Adults at Primary Care Visits: the VITAL-AF Randomized Controlled Trial 96%
- Electrocardiographic Manifestations of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Myocarditis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Heart Failure Subtypes and Atrial fibrillation: Data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study 98%
- Clinical Outcomes, Management, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Cost According to the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc Scores in Asian Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation 95%
- Family screening for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: initial cardiologic assessment, and long-term follow-up of genotype-positive phenotype-negative individuals 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.