Community pharmacists referrals to General Practice with suspected need of antibiotics - a national prospective pilot
Stehlik, P.; Moles, R.; Jones, M.; Murray, A.; El-den, S.; Morgan, M.; Del Mar, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundInterventions to minimise community antibiotic use have focused on the GP and patient behaviour rather than the community pharmacist. Patient expectations are a known driver for antibiotic prescribing, and pharmacists may be inveterately contributing to these expectations by referring patients for GPs for suspected antibiotic-requiring infections (S-ARI). We sought to quantify these referral rates. MethodPharmacists and GPs were recruited independently using convenience sampling and completed prospective data collection on 20 minor ailment encounters and consecutive consultations respectively. Pharmacists recorded patient gender, age, referral reason and comments (if any). GPs recorded patient age, gender, reason for visit, and origin of patient referral including self-referral. All data were analysed descriptively. Generalised estimating equations, multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate factors that may be associated with pharmacist referral rates. ResultsNineteen pharmacists representing 466 minor ailments encounters, and 19 GPs representing 394 consultations were recruited. Pharmacists referred 16.5% (77/466) of all minor ailments encounters for S-ARI. Comments suggested that reasons included upper-respiratory tract, ear nose and throat, and urinary tract infections. Most of S-ARI referrals were to a GP (62/466). None of the 88 consultations for infection in GP data were documented as being referred by a pharmacist; majority were self-referred (77.3%; 68/88). DiscussionPharmacists referred 1 in 8 minor ailments encounters to the GP for S-ARI, with some indication they were for conditions that do not require antibiotics. Most GP consultations for infection were documented as self-referrals. Both provide potential points of intervention to minimise antibiotic use.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the General Practice Pharmacist (GPP) intervention to optimise prescribing in Irish primary care: a non-randomised pilot study 94%
- Risks of use and non-use of antibiotics in primary care. Qualitative study of prescribers' views 94%
- Active vaccine safety surveillance via a scalable, integrated system in Australian pharmacies 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in medication reconciliation interventions between six hospitals: a mixed method study 95%
- Management of the COVID-19 health crisis: A survey in Swiss hospital pharmacies 94%
- Educational interventions delivered to prescribing advisers to influence primary care prescribing: a very low-cost pragmatic randomised trial using routine data from OpenPrescribing.net 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Variation in prescription duration for long term conditions: a cohort study in English NHS primary care using OpenPrescribing 94%
- OpenSAFELY NHS Service Restoration Observatory 1: describing trends and variation in primary care clinical activity for 23.3 million patients in England during the first wave of COVID-19 92%
- Effect of antibiotic consumption on self-reported recovery from uncomplicated urinary tract infection 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative exploration of barriers to efficient and effective Structured Medication Reviews in Primary Care: Findings from the DynAIRx study 93%
- Perspectives of pharmacy employees on an inappropriate use of antimicrobials in Kathmandu, Nepal 93%
- A Descriptive Analysis of Calls to the NSW Teratogen Information Service regarding use of anti-infectives during pregnancy 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 93%
- Acceptability of fixed-dose combination treatments for hypertension in Kenya: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability 92%
- Drivers of inappropriate use of antimicrobials in South Asia: A systematic review of qualitative literature 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.