Adverse sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health care in seven low- and middle-income countries: MASC study

ObjectivesIn this context the MASC study aimed to: (1) identify the consequences of the pandemic for mental health services and people with pre-existing mental health conditions (MHCs) in 6 low- and middle-income countries; and (2) identify good practice to mitigate these impacts. DesignAn observational study, using a mixed-methods convergent design triangulating data from (1) semi-structured interviews or focus groups and/or a self-completed survey; (2) routine service utilization data; (3) local grey literature; and (4) expert consultation. SettingThe study was conducted in Chile, Ethiopia, Georgia, Nigeria, South Africa and Sri Lanka. Participants121 key informants. ResultsWe found clear evidence in all sites that the pandemic exacerbated pre-existing disadvantages experienced by people with MHCs and led to a deterioration in the availability and quality of care, especially for psychosocial care. Alongside increased vulnerability to COVID-19, people with MHCs faced additional barriers to accessing prevention and treatment interventions compared to the general population. To varying extents, sites showed accelerated implementation of digital technologies, but with evidence of worsening inequities in access. Where primary care-based mental health care was more developed or prioritised, systems seemed more resilient and adaptive. ConclusionOur findings have the following implications. First, mental health service reductions are clear examples of structural stigma, namely policy level decisions in healthcare which place a low priority upon services for people with MHCs. Second, integration of mental health care into all general health care settings is key to ensuring accessibility and parity of physical and mental health care. Third, digital innovations should be designed to strengthen and not fragment systems. We discuss these findings in terms of anticipating such challenges in future and preparing layers of resilience. Methodological Strengths and Limitations of this StudyO_LIThe MASC study used a mixed-methods convergent design, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data, which allowed for a nuanced understanding of the COVID-19 pandemic impact on mental health services across multiple countries. This design enabled our study to triangulate data capturing both numerical trends and in-depth perspectives, increasing the validity and reliability of the findings. C_LIO_LIThe study covered six diverse low- and middle-income countries across five continents, enabling cross-country comparisons and insights into varied socio-cultural and economic contexts. This geographic diversity strengthens the studys generalisability to other settings with similar resource constraints. C_LIO_LIA mixture of online and in-person data collection in local languages was employed, overcoming pandemic-related barriers and enhancing accessibility for participants across the regions, which minimised data collection disruptions. C_LIO_LIThe study faced limitations in obtaining comparable quantitative data across countries, with concerns about the accuracy and reliability of routine data. C_LIO_LIReliance on national experts may have introduced potential biases if experts were not fully representative of the wider mental health context. C_LI