Optimizing Ocular Pathology Classification with CNNs and OCT Imaging: A Systematic and Performance Review
Hauri-Rosales, W.; Perez, O.; Garcia-Roa, M.; Lopez-Star, E.; Olivares-Pinto, U.
Show abstract
Vision loss due to chronic-degenerative diseases is a primary cause of blindness worldwide. Deep learning architectures utilizing optical coherence tomography images have proven effective for the early diagnosis of ocular pathologies. Nevertheless, most studies have emphasized the best outcomes using optimal hyperparameter combinations and extensive data availability. This focus has eclipsed the exploration of how model learning capacity varies with different data volumes. The current study evaluates the learning capabilities of efficient deep-learning classification models across various data amounts, aiming to determine the necessary data portion for effective clinical trial classifications of ocular pathologies. A comprehensive review was conducted, which included 295 papers that employed OCT images to classify one or more of the following retinal pathologies: Drusen, Diabetic Macular Edema, and Choroidal Neovascularization. Performance metrics and dataset details were extracted from these studies. Four Convolutional Neural Networks were selected and trained using three strategies: initializing with random weights, fine-tuning, and retraining only the classification layers. The resultant performance was compared based on training size and strategy to identify the optimal combination of model size, dataset size, and training approach. The findings revealed that, among the models trained with various strategies and data volumes, three achieved 99.9% accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Two of these models were fine-tuned, and one used random weight initialization. Remarkably, two models reached 99% accuracy using only 10% of the original training dataset. Additionally, a model that was less than 10% the size of the others achieved 98.7% accuracy and an F1 score on the test set while requiring 100 times less computing time. This study is the first to assess the impact of training data size and model complexity on performance metrics across three scenarios: random weights initialization, fine-tuning, and retraining classification layers only, specifically utilizing optical coherence tomography images.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-supervised contrastive learning improves machine learning discrimination of full thickness macular holes from epiretinal membranes in retinal OCT scans 96%
- An Inherently Interpretable AI model improves Screening Speed and Accuracy for Early Diabetic Retinopathy 96%
- Detecting papilloedema as a marker of raised intracranial pressure using artificial intelligence: a systematic review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Classification of dog breeds using convolutional neural network models and support vector machine 93%
- Deep Learning for Detection of Corneal Perforation on Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography in Microbial Keratitis 92%
- Development of a 3D vascular network visualization platform for one-dimensional hemodynamic simulation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- MultiHeadGAN: A Deep Learning Method for Low Contrast Retinal Pigment Epithelium Cells Segmentation in Fluorescent Flatmount Microscopy Images 94%
- The mathematics of erythema: Development of machine learning models for artificial intelligence assisted measurement and severity scoring of radiation induced dermatitis 94%
- BenchXAI: Comprehensive Benchmarking of Post-hoc Explainable AI Methods on Multi-Modal Biomedical Data 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.