Back

Predicting and Monitoring Symptoms in Diagnosed Depression Using Mobile Phone Data: An Observational Study

Ikäheimonen, A.; Luong, N.; Baryshnikov, I.; Darst, R.; Heikkilä, R.; Holmen, J.; Martikkala, A.; Riihimäki, K.; Saleva, O.; Isometsä, E.; Aledavood, T.

2024-06-17 health informatics
10.1101/2024.06.15.24308981 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundClinical diagnostic assessments and outcome monitoring of patients with depression rely predominantly on interviews by professionals and the use of self-report questionnaires. The ubiquity of smartphones and other personal consumer devices has prompted research into the potential of data collected via these devices to serve as digital behavioral markers for indicating presence and monitoring of outcome of depression. ObjectiveThis paper explores the potential of using behavioral data collected with mobile phones to detect and monitor depression symptoms in patients diagnosed with depression. MethodsIn a prospective cohort study, we collected smartphone behavioral data for up to one year. The study consists of observations from 99 subjects, including healthy controls (n=25) and patients diagnosed with various depressive disorders: major depressive disorder (MDD) (n=46), major depressive disorder with comorbid borderline personality disorder (MDD|BPD) (n=16), and bipolar disorder with major depressive episodes (MDE|BD) (n=12). Data were labeled based on depression severity, using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores. We performed statistical analysis and employed supervised machine learning on the data to classify the severity of depression and observe changes in the depression state over time. ResultsWe identified 32 behavioral markers associated with the changes in depressive state. Our analysis classified depressed subjects with an accuracy of 82% and depression state transitions with an accuracy of 75%. ConclusionsThe use of mobile phone digital behavioral markers to supplement clinical evaluations may aid in detecting the presence and relapse of clinical depression and monitoring its outcome, particularly if combined with intermittent use of self-report of symptoms.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.6%
2
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.9%
3
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.7%
5
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
6
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
8
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.8%
10
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
11
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
13
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
15
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
20
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
23
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%