Back

Weighted variance component test for the integrative multi-omics analysis of microbiome data

Zhang, A.; Ling, W.; Little, A.; Williams-Nguyen, J. S.; Moon, J.-Y.; Burk, R. D.; Knight, R.; Wang, D. D.; Qi, Q.; Kaplan, R.; Zhao, N.; Wu, M.

2024-06-17 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.06.14.599073 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Metabolic dysregulation and alterations have been linked to various diseases and conditions. Innovations in high-throughput technology now allow rapid profiling of the metabolome and metagenome -- often the gene content of bacterial populations -- for characterizing metabolism. Due to the small sample sizes and high dimensionality of the data, pathway analysis (wherein the effect of multiple genes or metabolites on an outcome is cumulatively assessed) of metabolomic data is commonly conducted and also represents a standard for metagenomic analysis. However, how to integrate both data types remains unclear. Recognizing that a metabolic pathway can be complementarily characterized by both metagenomics and metabolomics, we propose a weighted variance components framework to test if the joint effect of genes and metabolites in a biological pathway is associated with outcomes. The approach allows analytic p-value calculation, correlation between data types, and optimal weighting. Power simulations show that our approach often outperforms other strategies while maintaining type I error. The approach is illustrated on real data.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.