Designing symmetrical multi-component proteins using a hybrid generative AI approach
Dessaux, D.; Buchet, S.; Barthe, L.; Defresne, M.; Cioci, G.; de Givry, S.; Garcia-Alles, L. F.; Schiex, T.; Barbe, S.
Show abstract
Proteins, the fundamental building blocks of biological function, orchestrate complex cellular processes by assembling into intricate structures through meticulous interactions. The design of specific protein-protein interfaces to create customized protein assemblies holds immense potential for various biotechnological applications. To address the current limitations in designing heteromeric interactions for multi-component assemblies, we developed a hybrid generative AI design approach. This method combines deep learning and automated reasoning, explicitly considering both positive and negative interaction states to favor heteromeric desired over undesired interactions. The approach leverages Effie, a deep-learned pairwise decomposable scoring function, and an advanced reasoning tool extended for multicriteria optimization of this function. Here, we tested the ability of this hybrid AI method to redesign homomeric interfaces of bacterial microcompartment components (BMC-H) into heteromeric assemblies. We benchmarked its performance against ProteinMPNN, a sequence design autoregressive model. Our in silico assessment, complemented by experimental validation, highlights the outperformance of the hybrid AI generative design approach, and its potential to unlock the engineering of complex multi-component self-assembling protein entities.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Illuminating the mechanism and allosteric behavior of NanoLuc luciferase 96%
- Frustration in the Protein-Protein interface Plays a Central Role in the Cooperativity of PROTAC Ternary Complexes 95%
- A Fast Approach for Structural and Evolutionary Analysis Based on Energetic Profile Protein Comparison 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.