Benchmarking and quality control for nanopore sequencing and feasibility of rapid genomics in New Zealand: validation phase at a single quaternary hospital
Nyaga, D. M.; Tsai, P.; Gebbie, C.; Phua, H. H.; Yap, P.; Stabej, P. L. Q.; Farrow, S.; Rong, J.; Toldi, G.; Thorstensen, E.; Stark, Z.; Lunke, S.; Gamet, K.; Dyk, J. V.; Greenslade, M.; O'Sullivan, J. M.
Show abstract
Approximately 200 critically ill infants and children in New Zealand are in high-dependency neonatal/paediatric acute care at any given time, many with suspected genetic conditions, necessitating a scalable distributed solution for rapid genomic testing. We adopt the existing acute care genomics protocol of an accredited laboratory and established an expandable acute care clinical pipeline based around the Oxford Nanopore Technologies PromethION 2 solo system connected to a Bayesian AI-based clinical decision support tool (Fabric GEM software). In the establishment phase, we performed benchmarking using Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) benchmarking tools and Genome in a Bottle samples HG002-HG007. We evaluated single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions-deletions (indels) calls and achieved SNV precision and recall of 0.997 {+/-} 0.0006 and 0.992 {+/-} 0.001, respectively. Small indel identification approached a precision of 0.922 {+/-} 0.019 and recall of 0.838 {+/-} 0.043. Rarefaction analyses demonstrated that SNV identification plateaus at [~]20X coverage, while small indels plateaus at [~]40X coverage. Large genomic variations from Coriell Copy Number Variation Reference Panel 1 (CNVPANEL01) were reliably detected with [~]2M long reads. Finally, we present results obtained from ten trio samples that were processed through the pipeline validation phase, averaging a 5-day turnaround time, conducted in parallel with a clinically accredited short-read rapid genomic testing pipeline.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- IGenomic answers for children: Dynamic analyses of >1000 pediatric rare disease genomes 97%
- Assessment of the variant prioritisation strategy for genomic newborn screening in the Generation Study 96%
- The Importance of Automation in Genetic Diagnosis: Lessons from Analyzing an Inherited Retinal Degeneration Cohort with the Mendelian Analysis Toolkit (MATK) 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating Genome Sequencing Strategies: Trio, Singleton, and Standard Testing in Rare Disease Diagnosis 97%
- Genome-Wide Sequencing as a First-Tier Screening Test for Short Tandem Repeat Expansions 95%
- Recommendations for clinical interpretation of variants found in non-coding regions of the genome 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exome copy number variant detection, analysis and classification in a large cohort of families with undiagnosed rare genetic disease 96%
- Returning Actionable Genomic Results in a Research Biobank: Analytic Validity, Clinical Implementation and Resource Utilization 95%
- HiFi long-read genomes for difficult-to-detect clinically relevant variants 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- 3-hour genome sequencing and targeted analysis to rapidly assess genetic risk 97%
- Genetic Diagnosis of Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy Type 1 Using Rare Variant Linkage Analysis and Long Read Genome Sequencing 94%
- Detection and characterisation of copy number variants from exome sequencing in the DDD study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.