Back

Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions Associated With Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists Versus First Line Asthma Medications: A National Registry-Pharmacology Approach

Khan, M.; Hirsch, C.; Jones, A. M.

2024-06-13 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.06.12.24308833 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimsTo determine the suspected adverse drug reaction (ADR) profile of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs: montelukast and zafirlukast) relative to first-line asthma medications short-acting beta agonists (SABA: salbutamol) and inhaled corticosteroid (ICH: beclomethasone) in the United Kingdom. To determine chemical and pharmacological rationale for the suspected ADR signals. MethodsProperties of the asthma medications (pharmacokinetics and pharmacology) were datamined from the chemical database of bioactive molecules with drug-like properties, European molecular Biology laboratory (ChEMBL). Suspected ADR profiles of the asthma medications was curated from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Authority (MHRA) Yellow Card interactive drug analysis profiles (iDAP) and concatenated to the standardised prescribing levels (Open Prescribing) between 2018-2023. ResultsTotal ADRs per 100,000 Rx (P < .001) and psychiatric system organ class (SOC) ADRs (P < .001) reached statistical significance. Montelukast exhibited the greatest ADR rate at 15.64 per 100,000 Rx. The low lipophilic ligand efficiency (LLE = 0.15) of montelukast relative to the controls may explain the promiscuity of interactions with off-target G-coupled protein receptors (GPCRs). This included the dopamine signalling axis, which in combination with bioaccumulation in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to achieve Cmax beyond a typical dose can be ascribed to the psychiatric side effects observed. Cardiac ADRs did not reach statistical significance but inhibitory interaction of montelukast with the MAP kinase p38 alpha (a cardiac protective pathway) was identified as a potential rationale for montelukast withdrawal cardiac effects. ConclusionRelative to the controls, montelukast displays a range of suspected system organ class level ADRs. For psychiatric ADR, montelukast is statistically significant (P < .001). A mechanistic hypothesis is proposed based on polypharmacological interactions in combination with CSF levels attained. This work further supports the close monitoring of montelukast for neuropsychiatric side effects.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.1%
3
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
5
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.9%
6
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
7
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
9
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
10
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
12
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
13
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
14
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
15
RMD Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
16
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
18
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
19
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Allergy
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%