Leveraging Citizen Science To Assess Richness, Diversity, And Abundance In Ant Communities
Szewczyk, T. M.; Lavanchy, G.; Freitag, A.; Depraz, A.; Avril, A.; Broennimann, O.; Guisan, A.; Bertelsmeier, C.; Schwander, T.
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWCitizen science is a key resource in overcoming the logistical challenges of monitoring biodiversity. While datasets collected by groups of volunteers typically have biases, recent methodological and technological advances provide approaches for accounting for such biases, particularly in the context of modelling species distributions and diversity. Specifically, data integration techniques allow for the combination of scientifically collected datasets with haphazardly sampled presence-only datasets created by most citizen science initiatives. Here, we use a hierarchical Bayesian framework to integrate a set of ant presences collected by citizen scientists in the Vaud canton (Switzerland) with ant colony density data collected concurrently in the same region following a scientific sampling design. The community-level Poisson point process model included species-specific responses to the local (1.2 m2) and regional (1 km2) environment, with the presence-only samples incorporated at the regional scale to predict local and regional ant communities. At the regional scale, species richness followed a hump-shaped pattern and peaked near 1000 m while abundance increased with elevation. Low elevation and montane ant communities were composed of distinct species assemblages. At the local scale, the link between elevation and richness, diversity, and abundance was weak. At low elevations, local plots varied both in total abundance and species composition, while at higher elevations, the species composition was less variable. The citizen science dataset showed a general tendency toward under-representation of certain species, and heavy spatial sampling bias. Nonetheless, the inclusion of the citizen science data improved predictions of local communities, and also reduced susceptibility to over-fitting. Additionally, the citizen science dataset included many rare species not detected in the structured abundance dataset. The model described here illustrates a framework for capitalizing on the efforts of citizen scientists to better understand the patterns and distribution of biodiversity.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Jack-of-all-trades paradigm meets long-term data: generalist herbivores are more widespread and locally less abundant 95%
- Empirical abundance distributions are more uneven than expected given their statistical baseline 94%
- Predictions of biodiversity are improved by integrating trait-based competition with abiotic filtering 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Food webs can deliver win-win strategies for tropical agroforestry and biodiversity conservation 93%
- Fitting individual-based models of spatial population dynamics to long-term monitoring data 93%
- Orchards and paddy differentially impact rock outcrop amphibians: Insights from community- and species-level responses 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inferring ecological selection from multidimensional community trait distributions along environmental gradients 95%
- Local biodiversity change reflects interactions among changing abundance, evenness and richness 95%
- Seasonal structural stability promoted by forest diversity and composition explains overyielding 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.