Back

Prevalence of Depression in pre- and post-operative CABG (Coronary Artery Bypass Graft) patients

Tariq, M.; Mazhar, I.; Rai, M. M.; Umaira Khan, Q.; Daniyal, M.; Faisal, D.

2024-06-07 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2024.06.06.24308577 medRxiv
Show abstract

Depression in post-surgical patients is a common occurrence. It is likely to occur in cardiac surgery like Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. This condition could significantly prolong recovery time and could result in complications. Therefore, this study aimed to study the prevalence of Post-Operative Depression amongst Coronary Artery Bypass Graft patients. The undertaken research was conducted amongst patients who had undergone CABG at CMH Lahore and Punjab Institute of Cardiology. A survey was conducted on a sample size of 150 patients, out of which 147 gave consent to participation. The sample size was calculated using WHO Formula. The severity of depression was analyzed through questions in the Becks Depression Inventory. Data was analyzed using SPSS software (25.0 version). Out of 147 patients, 110 were males and 37 were females. The results depicted greater depression amongst females than in males both pre-operatively and post-operatively, with a mean score of 1.41 and 1.08 respectively. A significant difference (p<0.01) was obtained between the correlation of Pre-Operative Scores (in percentages and frequency) and Post-Operative Scores (in percentages and frequency). An insignificant difference (p=0.125) was obtained between the correlation between Preoperative Scores and Gender. A greater Mean Score (1.41) was seen in females, indicating more post-operative depression than males (1.05). An insignificant difference (p=0.239) was obtained between the correlation between Preoperative Scores and Gender. A greater Mean Score (1.08) was seen in females, indicating more post-operative depression than males (0.84). The study concluded that the prevalence of postoperative depression among patients was not significant.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
28.5%
2
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
50% of probability mass above
3
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
5
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
6
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
7
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
8
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
9
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
10
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
11
Health Science Reports
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
14
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
15
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
16
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
17
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
19
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
20
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
21
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
23
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%