Back

Disability inclusion in the Brazilian health system: results of a health system assessment

Polack, S.; Delgado Ramos, V.; Sepulveda Koptcke, L.; de Araujo Morais, I.; Veloso de Albuquerque, M. S.; Reichenberger, V.; Scherer, N.; Kuper, H.; Maciel Lyra, T.; Moran de Brito, C. M.

2024-06-05 public and global health
10.1101/2024.06.04.24308469 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPeople with disabilities face more barriers accessing healthcare and, on average, experience worse health outcomes. Strengthening health access for people with disabilities requires coordinated action across the health system. The Missing Billion Inclusive Health System Framework is a new tool to support policy makers assess levels of disability inclusion within health systems. In this study we use the framework within the Unified Health System in Brazil. We consider the relevance and feasibility of the indicators, as part of further testing and refining the framework. MethodsInformation sources, used to complete the assessment, included Brazilian laws and policies, publically available data, published literature and interviews with people with disabilities and service providers. A workshop with stakeholders was held to co-develop key recommendations. FindingsOverall, the framework was comprehensive and feasible to complete. It highlighted key strengths in terms of disability inclusion in the Brazilian health system as well as gaps and leverage points for action. InterpretationThe Missing Billions framework can identify progress and opportunities to strengthen disability inclusion in health systems. In Brazil, key promotive factors include supportive policies, leadership and financing structures. There are also opportunities for strengthening data and evidence, healthcare worker training on disability and health service accessibility. Actions must be centered on, and informed by, people with disabilities. FundingThis work was supported by the Sao Paulo Research Foundation, Brazilian National Council for Scientific Technological Development, Federate District Research Foundation and the Medical Research Council. Hannah Kuper is supported by a NIHR Global Research Professorship.

Published in Global Health Action (predicted rank #5) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.