Exploring Pathways to Compulsory Detention and Ways to Prevent Repeat Compulsory Detentions; Clinician Perspectives

BackgroundRates of compulsory detention in psychiatric hospitals have risen over several decades in England and some other higher income countries. This study explores clinicians perspectives on how service users come to be compulsorily detained in psychiatric hospitals and their suggestions for reducing these detentions in the future. MethodsSemi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 23 clinicians working with individuals who have been compulsorily detained under the Mental Health Act in England. Interviews were carried out by telephone or videoconference. Data were analysed using template analysis. ResultsThree major themes were identified, with multiple sub-themes (a) service user factors that increase risk of compulsory detention, including high levels of risk, previous/underlying trauma, medication non-adherence, service user perceptions of their mental health state, disadvantage and discrimination, and lack of stability and involvement from family and social networks; (b) service-level reasons for being detained, including lack of communication and continuity of care, historical inability to obtain trust and confidence from parts of population, clinician biases and assumptions, lack of resources, lack of treatment and care variety, and systemic/institutional barriers to engagement; and (c) ways to improve services to reduce compulsory detainment, including increasing quality of care and patient/family level interventions, investing in services, offer choice regarding medication, offer alternatives to compulsory detention, and improve discharge planning. ConclusionsFindings suggested clinicians see that at least some compulsory hospital admissions as avoidable, particularly through better resourced and more accessible services and changes in staff attitudes to address unconscious biases and promote collaborative care. Our findings provide a range of potential means to reduce detentions, which warrant development and testing in research and practice.