Back

A Non-Invasive and Non-Contact Jugular Venous Pulse Measurement: A Feasibility Study

Das, S.; Dwivedi, G.; Afsharan, H.; Kavehei, O.

2024-06-07 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.06.04.24308313
Show abstract

The Jugular Venous Pulse (JVP) is a vital gauge of proper heart health, reflecting the venous pressure via the Jugular Vein observation. It offers crucial insights for discerning numerous cardiac and pulmonary conditions. Yet, its evaluation is often over-shadowed by the challenges in its process, especially in patients with neck obesity obstructing visibility. Although central venous catheterization provides an alternative, it is invasive and typically reserved for critical cases. Traditional JVP monitoring methods, both visual and via catheterization, present significant hurdles, limiting their frequent application despite their clinical significance. Therefore, there is a pressing need for a non-invasive, efficient JVP monitoring method accessible for home-based and hospitalized patients. Such a method could preempt numerous hospital admissions by offering early indicators. We introduce a non-invasive method using a frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar for JVP estimation directly from the skin surface. Our signal processing technique involves an eigen beamforming method to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio for better estimation of JVP. By meticulously fine-tuning various parameters, we identified the optimal settings to enhance the JVP signal quality. In addition, we performed a detailed morphological analysis comparing the JVP and photoplethysmography signals. Our investigation effectively achieved signal localization within a Direction of Arrival (DoA) range from -20{degrees} to 20{degrees}. This initial study validates the effectiveness of using a 60 GHz far-field radar in measuring JVP. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=110 SRC="FIGDIR/small/24308313v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (32K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d95a7dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c3e6d4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@678f28org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e7a0d7_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 9%
12.4%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 51%
10.0%
3
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Frontiers in Physiology
based on 18 papers
Top 0.1%
7.4%
5
Sensors
based on 18 papers
Top 0.2%
7.4%
6
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
based on 33 papers
Top 2%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Heart Rhythm
based on 16 papers
Top 0.8%
5.0%
8
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 4%
4.4%
9
Computers in Biology and Medicine
based on 39 papers
Top 1%
4.4%
10
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 0.5%
2.8%
11
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 7%
2.3%
13
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 8%
1.7%
14
IEEE Access
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
15
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 5%
1.2%
16
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
17
JMIRx Med
based on 29 papers
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Royal Society Open Science
based on 49 papers
Top 5%
1.2%
19
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 8%
1.2%
20
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Advanced Science
based on 12 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
22
The American Journal of Cardiology
based on 15 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
23
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
based on 15 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 18%
0.7%
25
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
based on 13 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Hypertension
based on 20 papers
Top 4%
0.7%