Back

A Non-Invasive and Non-Contact Jugular Venous Pulse Measurement: A Feasibility Study

Das, S.; Dwivedi, G.; Afsharan, H.; Kavehei, O.

2024-06-07 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.06.04.24308313 medRxiv
Show abstract

The Jugular Venous Pulse (JVP) is a vital gauge of proper heart health, reflecting the venous pressure via the Jugular Vein observation. It offers crucial insights for discerning numerous cardiac and pulmonary conditions. Yet, its evaluation is often over-shadowed by the challenges in its process, especially in patients with neck obesity obstructing visibility. Although central venous catheterization provides an alternative, it is invasive and typically reserved for critical cases. Traditional JVP monitoring methods, both visual and via catheterization, present significant hurdles, limiting their frequent application despite their clinical significance. Therefore, there is a pressing need for a non-invasive, efficient JVP monitoring method accessible for home-based and hospitalized patients. Such a method could preempt numerous hospital admissions by offering early indicators. We introduce a non-invasive method using a frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar for JVP estimation directly from the skin surface. Our signal processing technique involves an eigen beamforming method to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio for better estimation of JVP. By meticulously fine-tuning various parameters, we identified the optimal settings to enhance the JVP signal quality. In addition, we performed a detailed morphological analysis comparing the JVP and photoplethysmography signals. Our investigation effectively achieved signal localization within a Direction of Arrival (DoA) range from -20{degrees} to 20{degrees}. This initial study validates the effectiveness of using a 60 GHz far-field radar in measuring JVP. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=110 SRC="FIGDIR/small/24308313v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (32K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d95a7dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c3e6d4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@678f28org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e7a0d7_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.0%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.1%
3
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.4%
4
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.4%
6
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
7
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
8
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
9
Physiological Measurement
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
11
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
12
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
13
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
14
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
16
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
17
MethodsX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
18
Talanta
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%