Long term smoking and quitting among people with severe mental illness: 3-year follow-up of the SCIMITAR+ Trial
Gilbody, S.; The SCIMITAR collaborative,
Show abstract
BackgroundPeople with severe mental illnesses (SMIs) are three times more likely to smoke than the wider population, contributing to widening health inequalities. Here we report the long term [3 year] outcomes for the SCIMITAR+ trial (ISRCTN72955454), which compared usual care to a bespoke smoking cessation package. MethodsWe recruited 526 heavy smokers with bipolar illness or schizophrenia who were randomly allocated to a bespoke smoking cessation intervention (n=265) or to usual care (n=261) between October 2015 and December 2016. We measured long-term quitting by carbon monoxide-verified smoking status at 3 years post randomisation, and a range of secondary outcomes. Results261 of the original 526 were followed up. 209 participants (80.1% of followed-up; 39.7% of randomised) could be defined as a smoker or non-smoker for the 36-month primary analysis. Forty-three participants (16.5% of 261) were determined to be a non-smoker via self-reporting and CO confirmation; 21 in the intervention arm (16.3% of 129; 19.6% of those who provided both self-reported and CO measure) and 22 in the control arm (16.7% of 132; 21.6% of those who provided both self-reported and CO measure) - adjusted OR of 0.89 (95% CI 0.45, 1.77, p = 0.74). For secondary outcomes, there was no sustained between group difference in reduction in nicotine dependence (measured using the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence) or motivation to quit. Some short-term improvements in physical health (measured by the Short Form 12) were present at 36 months. ConclusionsA bespoke intervention represents the model for care for mental health services in the UK, but long term quit rates cannot be assumed. Sustained attention to smoking and relapse is likely to be needed to ensure that short term gains are maintained. The certainty of these results is tempered by loss to follow up and low statistical power. FundingThis study was funded by NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme (Project number 11/136/52) Plain English SummarySmoking rates are very high amongst people who use mental health services. This makes a significant contribution to health inequalities and reduced life expectancy. Earlier research has shown that smoking cessation services are effective when the specific needs of people with mental ill health are taken into account. This forms the basis of guidelines issued by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. In this study we looked at the longer-term impact of an intervention to help people to quit smoking. At three years under half of the people who took part in the original study were able to provide information on their use of tobacco. The rates of smoking were similar between people who received the intervention three years ago, and those who received only usual care. Since we already know that the intervention is effective in helping people to quit in the short term, it would be prudent to ensure that people continue to be offered care to help them to quit if they are at risk of relapse. The longer-term impact of a brief intervention on longer term quit rates cannot be assumed, since the strength of this conclusion is limited because we were only able to follow up under half of the people who took part in the study. Further research is needed into the optimum way in which the health benefits of quitting can be sustained in the longer term.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Individual participant data systematic reviews with meta-analyses of psychotherapies for borderline personality disorder: A protocol 93%
- The Antidepressant Advisor (ADeSS): A Decision Support System for Antidepressant Treatment for Depression in UK primary care – a feasibility study 93%
- Prevalence and characteristics of hazardous and harmful drinkers receiving general practitioners’ brief advice on and support with alcohol consumption in Germany: results of a population survey 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health service utilisation following self-harm: a systematic review 92%
- Comparing mental health trajectories of four different types of key workers with non-key workers: A 12-month follow-up observational study of 21,874 adults in England during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
- Ethnic inequalities in compulsory psychiatric hospital detentions during UK COVID-19 'lockdowns': A Regression Discontinuity Design in time study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Did social factors buffer against the effect of adversities on self-harm during the COVID-19 pandemic? A longitudinal analysis of 49,227 UK adults 94%
- How has the COVID-19 pandemic impacted on smoking and nicotine dependence among people with severe mental ill health? Analysis of linked data from a UK Closing the Gap Cohort 94%
- The prevalence, incidence, prognosis and risk factors for depression and anxiety in a UK cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-session intervention with and without video support to prevent the worsening of emotional distress among healthcare workers during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a randomized clinical trial 94%
- Co-prescription of Metformin and Antipsychotics in Severe Mental Illness: A UK Primary Care Cohort Study 91%
- The development and validation of a prognostic model to predict relapse in adults with remitted depression in primary care: secondary analysis of pooled individual participant data from multiple studies 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations of cannabis use, tobacco use and incident anxiety, mood, and psychotic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Predicting involuntary admission following inpatient psychiatric treatment using machine learning trained on electronic health record data 92%
- Longitudinal associations between stroke and psychosis: a population-based study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.