Back

Effects of Tasks on Functional Brain Connectivity Derived from Inter-Individual Correlations: Insights from Regional Homogeneity of Functional MRI Data

Di, X.; Jain, P.; Biswal, B. B.

2025-05-05 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.06.02.597063 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Research on brain functional connectivity often relies on intra-individual moment-to-moment correlations of functional activity, typically using functional MRI (fMRI). Inter-individual correlations are also employed on data from fMRI and positron emission tomography (PET). Many studies have not specified tasks during scanning, keeping participants in an implicit "resting" condition. This lack of task specificity raises questions about how different tasks impact inter-individual correlation estimates. In our analysis of fMRI data from 100 unrelated participants, scanned during seven tasks and in a resting state, we calculated Regional Homogeneity (ReHo) for each task as a regional measure of brain functions. We found that changes in ReHo due to tasks were relatively small compared with its variations across brain regions. Cross-region variations of ReHo were highly correlated among tasks. Similarly, whole-brain inter-individual correlation patterns were remarkably consistent across the tasks, showing correlations greater than 0.78. Changes in inter-individual correlations between tasks were primarily driven by connectivity in the visual, somatomotor, default mode network, and the interactions between them. This subtle yet statistically significant differences in functional connectivity may be linked to specific brain regions associated with the studied tasks. Future studies should consider task design when exploring inter-individual connectivity in specific brain systems. Impact StatementInter-individual correlation is increasingly used to estimate brain connectivity, complementing intra-individual correlations in fMRI, particularly for measures like cerebral blood flow obtained via fMRI and PET. However, how task performance affects inter-individual correlations is largely unknown. This study used regional homogeneity as a summary measure of brain functions from task-based fMRI data across eight tasks. The inter-individual correlations were highly similar across tasks, indicating the underlying brain network structure can be inferred under various conditions. Subtle but statistically significant differences in connectivity estimates suggest the functional significance of this approach.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
19.0%
2
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.0%
3
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.2%
4
Brain Connectivity
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.2%
8
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
11
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Brain Imaging and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
19
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
Neuroimage: Reports
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
26
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%