Meta TCT: Towards Interpretable Treatment Effects in Clinical Trials for Progressive Diseases
Stijven, F.; Mallinckrodt, C. H.; Molenberghs, G.; Alonso, A.; Dickson, S.; Hendrix, S.
Show abstract
In progressive diseases, like Alzheimers disease, treatments that slow progression should start early in the disease course to longer maintain higher levels of functioning. In corresponding clinical trials, the treatment effect is usually expressed in terms of mean differences on a clinical scale. Early in the disease course, however, treatment effects expressed on a clinical scale are often small but may nonetheless correspond to an important slowing of disease progression. This complicates the appreciation of the relevance of observed treatment effects. For example, it may be difficult to determine whether a 2-point improvement on a clinical scale is relevant for clinical practice. In this paper, we propose the meta Time-Component Tests (meta TCT). This new approach leads to estimators of treatment effects on the time scale, in terms of time saved or percentage slowing of progression, that are easy to interpret. This approach is based on estimates obtained from an arbitrary model for longitudinal data and is, therefore, very flexible. Asymptotic properties of the Meta TCT estimators are derived and evaluated in an extensive simulation study. Meta TCT is then applied to a phase 2/3 clinical trial for Alzheimers disease, which was first analyzed with a mixed model. In this trial, meta TCT leads to important additional insights into the treatment effect. We believe that meta TCT will facilitate the estimation of interpretable treatment effects in clinical trials for progressive diseases, and that this, in turn, will fine-tune the evaluation of the clinical relevance of new treatments.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Double Machine Learning Approach for the Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness under the Test-Negative Design: Analysis of Québec Administrative Data 97%
- Sensitivity to missing not at random dropout in clinical trials: use and interpretation of the Trimmed Means Estimator 96%
- Network meta-analysis and random walks 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Two-Stage Multivariate Mendelian Randomization on Multiple Outcomes with Mixed Distributions 95%
- Health Utility Adjusted Survival: a Composite Endpoint for Clinical Trial Designs 94%
- Adjusting for time of infection or positive test when estimating the risk of a post-infection outcome in an epidemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction-powered Inference for Clinical Trials 97%
- External control arm analysis: an evaluation of propensity score approaches, G-computation, and doubly debiased machine learning 95%
- Comparison of Bayesian networks, G-estimation and linear models to estimate causal treatment effects in aggregated N-of-1 trials 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.