Prostad: The development and evaluation of a prostate cancer rapid diagnostic pathway, a protocol
Jones, K. R.; Rees, S.; Chandran, A.; Erdem, E.; Jones, M.; Farrington, S.; Sewell, B.; Rich, N. L.; Fitzsimmons, D.; Rance, J. Y.; Mackrell, J.; Ng, Y.; Shanbhag, S.; Gemine, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundDelay to cancer diagnosis is associated with poorer outcomes. In response to delays to cancer diagnosis in the UK, a number of Rapid Diagnosis Centres (RDCs), Multi-Disciplinary Centres (MDCs) and other pathway reforms have been piloted and implemented in recent years. Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer for men or those assigned male at birth in the UK. In Wales, the recommended time to diagnosis is within 62 days from point of suspicion. For patients served by Hywel Dda University Health Board, current waiting times on the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway are prolonged, falling well outside the 28-day decision to treat and 62-day referral to treatment targets. A revised prostate cancer diagnostic pathway called Prostad (Wesh for "prostate") has been developed and is currently being implemented with the aim of reducing time to diagnosis (or discharge) for patients referred for investigation. This protocol describes Prostad and the planned evaluation approach. MethodsThis is a mixed-method evaluation. It is shaped by patient and public involvement throughout and incorporates realist interviews with multiple stakeholders (including NHS staff and patients), process mapping, economic evaluation, and monitoring of the intervention against its aims using routinely collected data. DiscussionTo the authors knowledge, this is the first project of its kind to combine service aims evaluation, cost-effectiveness analysis and realist evaluation approaches, and as such promises findings applicable to organisations and individuals with regard to various aims and priorities. Continued patient and public involvement throughout the study constitutes one of its strengths.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol summary and statistical analysis plan for the randomized trial of early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (ProScreen) 93%
- Development and validation of multivariable machine learning algorithms to predict risk of cancer in symptomatic patients referred urgently from primary care 93%
- Understanding preferences for self-sampling in a national cervical screening programme: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Educational interventions delivered to prescribing advisers to influence primary care prescribing: a very low-cost pragmatic randomised trial using routine data from OpenPrescribing.net 90%
- Spatio-temporal modelling of referrals to outpatient respiratory clinics in the integrated care system of the Morecambe Bay area, England 90%
- Cost-effectiveness of whole area testing of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in Merthyr Tydfil, 2020: A Modelling and economic analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inequalities in the decline and recovery of pathological cancer diagnoses during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based study 91%
- Applying a genetic risk score for prostate cancer to men with lower urinary tract symptoms in primary care to predict prostate cancer diagnosis: a cohort study in the UK Biobank 91%
- BRCA-DIRECT digital pathway for diagnostic germline genetic testing within a UK breast oncology setting: a randomised, non-inferiority trial 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 93%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 93%
- STIMULATE-ICP-CAREINEQUAL - Defining usual care and examining inequalities in Long Covid support: protocol for a mixed-methods study (part of STIMULATE-ICP: Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors affecting COVID-19 outcomes in cancer patients - A first report from Guys Cancer Centre in London 89%
- The Impact of the UK COVID-19 Lockdown on the Screening, Diagnostics and Incidence of Breast, Colorectal, Lung and Prostate Cancer in the UK: a Population-Based Cohort Study 89%
- Diagnostic accuracy and safety of coaxial core-needle biopsy (CNB) system in Oncology patients treated in a specialist cancer centre with prospective validation within clinical trial data 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.