Back

Pharmacodynamic modeling of colistin and imipenem against in vitro Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms

Guo, Y.; Yin, J.; Aulin, L. B. S.; Ciofu, O.; Moser, C.; Upadhyay, P. J.; Hoiby, N.; Wang, H.; Guo, T.; van Hasselt, J. G. C.

2024-06-02 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2024.05.28.596312 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionAntibiotic treatment of chronic biofilm-associated infections can be challenging. Characterization of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationships for biofilm-associated infections may be relevant to inform the design of antibiotic treatment regimens for biofilm-associated infections. To this end, we aim to develop a mathematical PK-PD model for planktonic and biofilm bacterial infections and demonstrate how PK-PD simulations can be used to design optimized dosing schedules, using imipenem and colistin as proof-of-concept examples. MethodsPharmacodynamic models were developed using time-kill assay data from planktonic and alginate-bead biofilm cultures of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exposed to imipenem or colistin. The PD models were coupled to population PK models for plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) to translate PD relationships for clinical dosing schedules and PK-PD indices. ResultsThe developed models incorporated sensitive and resistant bacterial subpopulations and were able to adequately capture the observed time-kill data. Simulation studies identified differences in suppression of bacterial growth dynamics for multiple clinical intravenous and inhalation-based treatment regimens and were used to infer biofilm-specific PK-PD indices associated with ELF target site concentrations. ConclusionIn conclusion, we demonstrate the utility of mathematical modeling for the characterization of PK-PD relationships underlying time-kill kinetic profiles in biofilm-associated infections and their utility in translating experimental findings to inform the optimization of clinical dosing schedules.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.