Back

The Virtual Cardiologist: Three Deep Learning Pipelines in an Inexpensive Portable Device and Web/Mobile Application for Rapid Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Clinical Decision-Making

Mehrotra-Varma, S.

2024-05-28 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.05.27.24307981 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHeart disease is the foremost cause of death worldwide, and specialty care such as cardiologists and expensive Doppler echocardiograms are scarce in rural areas. There is significant variability among physicians in interpreting heart sounds and 2D echocardiograms from more basic, widely available tools like stethoscopes and point-of-care ultrasound devices (POCUS), leading to treatment delays. Methods26 Deep-learning models were tested to optimally [a] stratify severity of aortic stenosis from POCUS 2D echocardiogram images [b] estimate cardiac ejection fraction (heart failure) from POCUS 2D echocardiogram videos and [c] identify pathologic heart murmurs using digital stethoscope recordings. The top performing model for each was integrated into a portable, inexpensive Raspberry-Pi device (Virtual Cardiologist), mobile application, and website. Each model was tested on two independent datasets to ensure accuracy. The heart murmur algorithm was also tested on 323 patients by recording their heart sounds via a custom and digital stethoscope in an outpatient setting for clinical validation. ResultsThe three top-performing models outperformed cardiologists and previous AI methods. The aortic stenosis model (AUC=0.89) utilized EfficientNet, a CNN with compound scaling built on a pre-trained computational backbone. The ejection fraction model (EchoSwin) incorporated Microsoft Swin transformers modified for video input (MAE=5.6). The heart murmur model employed an LSTM Autoencoder algorithm (AUC=0.92). ConclusionThe Virtual Cardiologist can serve as an accurate tool for patient assessment and triage for referral to tertiary care in remote areas with limited specialty care. This is the first tool of its kind for detection of multiple cardiovascular morbidities.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.