Assessing avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder symptoms using the Nine Item ARFID Screen in >9,000 Swedish adults with and without eating disorders
Presseller, E. K.; Cooper, G. E.; Thornton, L. M.; Birgegard, A.; Abbaspour, A.; Bulik, C. M.; Forsen Mantilla, E.; Dinkler, L.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe Nine Item ARFID Screen (NIAS) is a widely used measure assessing symptoms of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). Previous studies suggest that individuals with eating disorders driven by shape/weight concerns also have elevated scores on the NIAS. To further clarify this issue, we characterized NIAS scores in a large sample of individuals with eating disorders and evaluated overlap in symptoms measured by the NIAS and the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) version 6.0. MethodOur sample comprised 9,148 participants from the Eating Disorders Genetics Initiative Sweden (EDGI-SE), who completed surveys including NIAS and EDE-Q. NIAS scores were calculated and compared by eating disorder diagnostic group using descriptive statistics and linear models. ResultsParticipants with current anorexia nervosa demonstrated the highest mean NIAS scores and had the greatest proportion (57.0%) of individuals scoring above a clinical cutoff on at least one of the NIAS subscales. Individuals with bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, and other specified feeding or eating disorder also demonstrated elevated NIAS scores compared to individuals with no lifetime history of an eating disorder (ps < .05). All subscales of the NIAS showed small to moderate correlations with all subscales of the EDE-Q (rs = 0.26-0.40). DiscussionOur results substantiate that individuals with eating disorders other than ARFID demonstrate elevated scores on the NIAS, suggesting that this tool is inadequate on its own for differentiating ARFID from shape/weight-motivated eating disorders. Further research is needed to inform clinical interventions addressing the co-occurrence of ARFID-related drivers and shape/weight-related motivation for dietary restriction.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a parent-reported screening tool for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID): Initial validation and prevalence in 4-7-year-old Japanese children 95%
- Can't decide how much to EAT? Effort variability for reward is associated with cognitive restraint 93%
- Acute vagus nerve stimulation does not affect liking or wanting ratings of food in healthy participants 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anorexia nervosa polygenic risk, beyond diagnoses: relationship with adolescent disordered eating and behaviours in an Australian female twin population 98%
- Predicting Eating Disorder and Anxiety Symptoms Using Anorexia Nervosa and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Polygenic Scores 94%
- Using Major Depression Polygenic Risk Scores to Explore the Depressive Symptom Continuum 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comorbidity of self-harm and disordered eating in young people: Evidence from a UK population-based cohort 92%
- Strong Genetic Overlaps Between Dimensional and Categorical Models of Bipolar Disorders in a Family Sample 91%
- Validation of the short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire in young adulthood 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) emotional subscale in assessing depression and anxiety across development 92%
- The Norwegian Microbiota Study in Anorexia Nervosa (NORMA): integrating a clinical trial with preclinical experiments - a study protocol 91%
- The effect of body image dissatisfaction on goal-directed decision making in a population marked by negative appearance beliefs and disordered eating 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Elevated levels of hoarding in ADHD: a special link with inattention 92%
- Divergent transcriptomic profiles in depressed individuals with hyper- and hypophagia implicating inflammatory status 91%
- Clinical properties of the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire: Development of a free calculator based on a Brazilian High-Risk Cohort Study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.