Back

Assessing avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder symptoms using the Nine Item ARFID Screen in >9,000 Swedish adults with and without eating disorders

Presseller, E. K.; Cooper, G. E.; Thornton, L. M.; Birgegard, A.; Abbaspour, A.; Bulik, C. M.; Forsen Mantilla, E.; Dinkler, L.

2024-05-27 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2024.05.27.24307888 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThe Nine Item ARFID Screen (NIAS) is a widely used measure assessing symptoms of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). Previous studies suggest that individuals with eating disorders driven by shape/weight concerns also have elevated scores on the NIAS. To further clarify this issue, we characterized NIAS scores in a large sample of individuals with eating disorders and evaluated overlap in symptoms measured by the NIAS and the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) version 6.0. MethodOur sample comprised 9,148 participants from the Eating Disorders Genetics Initiative Sweden (EDGI-SE), who completed surveys including NIAS and EDE-Q. NIAS scores were calculated and compared by eating disorder diagnostic group using descriptive statistics and linear models. ResultsParticipants with current anorexia nervosa demonstrated the highest mean NIAS scores and had the greatest proportion (57.0%) of individuals scoring above a clinical cutoff on at least one of the NIAS subscales. Individuals with bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, and other specified feeding or eating disorder also demonstrated elevated NIAS scores compared to individuals with no lifetime history of an eating disorder (ps < .05). All subscales of the NIAS showed small to moderate correlations with all subscales of the EDE-Q (rs = 0.26-0.40). DiscussionOur results substantiate that individuals with eating disorders other than ARFID demonstrate elevated scores on the NIAS, suggesting that this tool is inadequate on its own for differentiating ARFID from shape/weight-motivated eating disorders. Further research is needed to inform clinical interventions addressing the co-occurrence of ARFID-related drivers and shape/weight-related motivation for dietary restriction.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.4%
3
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
4
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
6
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
8
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
10
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
14
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
15
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
17
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Alcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
28
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
30
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.5%