Back

Services in minoritized autistic adolescents and adults varying in language skills

Girolamo, T.; Escobedo, A.; Ghali, S.; Greene-Pendelton, K.; Campos, I.; Ram-Kiran, P.

2024-05-27 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2024.05.26.24307944 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRacially and ethnically minoritized (minoritized) autistic individuals face intersectional disparities in services access in the transition to adulthood. Our understanding of disparities is limited by systematic exclusion from research and inadequate approaches to characterizing services. To address these gaps and effect advocacy, this study: 1) examined services received, unmet service needs, and barriers in minoritized autistic adolescents and adults, and 2) determined if language, NVIQ, and autism traits predict services when deployed as binary or continuous variables. MethodAcademic and community partners tailored CBPR to a local context. Participants (N = 73, ages 13-30) completed a behavioral assessment protocol. Participants and caregivers provided information on services received, unmet service needs, and barriers to services. Data were analyzed using descriptives and regression. ResultsParticipants received multiple services yet had multiple unmet service needs and barriers. Effects of services differed by approach. Language impairment, but not language scores, predicted receiving more services. High levels of autism traits and autism trait scores predicted more unmet service needs. ImplicationsWhile the number of services and unmet service needs were similar to prior work, differences in individual service variables and effects support attention to heterogeneity. Findings support intersectional approaches to CBPR and autism research. Learning outcomesAfter reading the article, the learner will be able to: 1) summarize knowledge gaps about access to services; 2) explain the relevance of tailoring CBPR to a local context; and 3) describe implications of findings for clinicians and autistic individuals.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.4%
2
Autism Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
3
Molecular Autism
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
5
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.4%
9
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
11
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
12
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
15
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
16
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
23
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
24
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.5%