Back

Predicting Primary Graft Dysfunction in Lung Transplantation: Machine Learning-Guided Biomarker Discovery

Nord, D.; Brunson, J. C.; Langerude, L.; Moussa, H.; Gill, B.; Machuca, T.; Rackauskas, M.; Sharma, A. K.; Lin, C.; Emtiazjoo, A.; Atkinson, C.

2024-09-23 immunology
10.1101/2024.05.24.595368 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDThere is an urgent need to better understand the pathophysiology of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) so that point-of-care methods can be developed to predict those at risk. Here we utilize a multiplex multivariable approach to define cytokine, chemokines, and growth factors in patient-matched biospecimens from multiple biological sites to identify factors predictive of PGD. METHODSBiospecimens were collected from patients undergoing bilateral LTx from three distinct sites: donor lung perfusate, post-transplant bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid (2h), and plasma (2h and 24h). A 71-multiplex panel was performed on each biospecimen. Cross-validated logistic regression (LR) and random forest (RF) machine learning models were used to determine whether analytes in each site or from combination of sites, with or without clinical data, could discriminate between PGD grade 0 (n = 9) and 3 (n = 8). RESULTSUsing optimal AUROC, BAL fluid at 2h was the most predictive of PGD (LR, 0.825; RF, 0.919), followed by multi-timepoint plasma (LR, 0.841; RF, 0.653), then perfusate (LR, 0.565; RF, 0.448). Combined clinical, BAL, and plasma data yielded strongest performance (LR, 1.000; RF, 1.000). Using a LASSO of the predictors obtained using LR, we selected IL-1RA, BCA-1, and Fractalkine, as most predictive of severe PGD. CONCLUSIONSBAL samples collected 2h post-transplant were the strongest predictors of severe PGD. Our machine learning approach not only identified novel cytokines not previously associated with PGD, but identified analytes that could be used as a point-of-care cytokine panel aimed at identifying those at risk for developing severe PGD.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.0%
2
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.4%
4
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
5
American Journal of Transplantation
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
8
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
9
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
10
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Immunology & Cell Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
15
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Transfusion
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
19
American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
25
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Kidney International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
28
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
Journal of Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
30
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%