Improving allele-specific epigenomic signal coverage by 10-fold using Hidden Markov Modeling and Machine Learning
Dumont, E. L.; Janati, A.; Bhattacharya, M.; Jeannin, J.-B.; Do, C.
Show abstract
Allele-specific epigenomic signals refer to differences in epigenomic patterns between the two copies, or "alleles," of a DNA region inherited from each parent. Epigenomic patterns are defined as alterations of the DNA sequence (e.g., chemical) without modifying the underlying DNA sequence (which would be referred to as "mutations"). Mapping allele-specific epigenomic signals across a genome is crucial, as some can influence gene expression, disease susceptibility, and developmental processes. However, identifying allele-specific epigenomic patterns across an entire genome is limited by the average read length (50-150 nucleotides) of short-read sequencing technologies, which are the most widely-used and affordable whole genome sequencing methods, and by the 99.9% similarity in the DNA sequences inherited from each parent. These limitations restrict the assessment of allele-specific signals to approximately 10% of the genome, potentially overlooking critical regulatory regions. In this paper, we present a highly effective machine-learning approach based on variational hidden Markov modeling, which enables the detection of allele-specific epigenomic signals across the entire genome, resulting in a 10-fold improvement in genomic coverage compared to state-of-the-art methods. We demonstrate our method on DNA methylation, a critical epigenomic regulatory signal.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- ENNGene: an Easy Neural Network model building tool for Genomics 94%
- Visualizing and exploring patterns of large mutational events with SigProfilerMatrixGenerator 94%
- Characterizing the properties of bisulfite sequencing data: maximizing power and sensitivity to identify between-group differences in DNA methylation 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.