Back

Main Causes Of Medicine Stock-Outs In Mauritania: A Qualitative Study

Ag Ahmed, M. A.; Issa, C.; Ravinetto, R.; Buitrago, V. T.; Dujardin, C.

2024-05-23 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2024.05.23.24307794 medRxiv
Show abstract

The number of medicine stock-outs (MSOs) is increasing globally. In Mauritania, they are recurring, although, to our knowledge, no study has yet been conducted to determine the causes. Therefore, this qualitative study aims to identify the main local or national causes of stock-outs to provide a common understanding and guide policy-makers towards corrective actions. The study was carried out in five health districts and at the regional and central levels. The samples were purposive. Two focus groups and twenty semi-structured individual interviews were held with 38 participants, including health professionals, managers from the Central Purchasing Office for Essential Medicines and Consumables (CAMEC), the Pharmacy and Laboratory Department (DPL) and the Ministry of Health (MoH). All interviews were recorded and transcribed. A thematic content analysis was carried out. Our findings indicate the national causes of MSOs at three healthcare system levels (operational, regional, and central). They were grouped into five categories: insufficient human resource capacity (number of staff, training, retention), communication and coordination problems between stakeholders, logistical constraints (transport, storage), financial constraints, inadequate forecasting of needs, and complex procurement procedures. These causes of MSOs are interconnected, and many could be addressed locally through solutions initiated and led by the Mauritanian authorities. To address MSOs sustainably, we suggest and discuss some possible actions, including reforms to improve CAMECs governance and accountability and, more broadly, to strengthen the various pillars of the local health and pharmaceutical system.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.