Huntingtin CAG repeat size variations outside the Huntington's disease complex: associations with depression and anxiety phenotypes and basal ganglia structure
Vater, M.; Rost, N.; Eckstein, G.; Sauer, S.; Tontsch, A.; Erhardt, A.; Lucae, S.; Brueckl, T. M.; Klopstock, T.; Saemann, P. G.; Binder, E. B.
Show abstract
Huntingtons Disease (HD) is strongly associated with psychiatric symptoms, yet, associations between Huntingtin gene (HTT) CAG repeat size variations and psychiatric phenotypes outside the HD complex are still under-investigated. In this genetic case-control study we compared the distribution of HTT CAG repeat sizes in predefined ranges between patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) (n=2136) and anxiety disorders (ANX) (n=493), and healthy controls (CON) (n=1566). We used regression models to study interactions between the alleles and associations with fine-granular clinical phenotypes and basal ganglia structure. HD mutations in the range of incomplete penetrance (36-39 repeats) were not overrepresented in patients. In participants older than 48 years, 13-20 repeats on both HTT alleles were associated with a reduced ANX risk whereas a 13-20|21-26 combination was associated with an increased ANX risk. Post-hoc analyses confirmed a turning point around 21 repeats and trends in the same direction were detected for MDD. The joint patient|CON analysis of the full spectrum of allele combinations confirmed interaction effects and age-dependent allele|risk profiles. A short-by-long interaction effect and an age-dependent negative correlation of the short allele on the nucleus accumbens volume was detected, independently of the diagnostic group. In conclusion, we revealed that HTT CAG repeat sizes of both alleles in the non-HD range modulate the susceptibility for common psychiatric disorders and basal ganglia structure in an age-dependent way, displaying that normal variation of the functionally diverse wildtype huntingtin protein may already impact brain function.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Epigenetic and Genetic Profiling of Comorbidity Patterns among Substance Dependence Diagnoses 95%
- A brain-enriched circRNA blood biomarker can predict response to SSRI antidepressants 93%
- Immunological Drivers and Potential Novel Drug Targets for Major Psychiatric, Neurodevelopmental, and Neurodegenerative Conditions 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A CAG repeat threshold for therapeutics targeting somatic instability in Huntington's disease 93%
- Modelling Fragile X-Associated Neuropsychiatric Disorders in Young Inducible 90CGG Premutation Mice 92%
- Sex differences in the pleiotropy of hearing difficulty with imaging-derived phenotypes: a brain-wide investigation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Are psychiatric disorders risk factors for COVID-19 susceptibility and severity? a two-sample, bidirectional, univariable and multivariable Mendelian Randomization study 92%
- Multi-omics profiling of DNA methylation and gene expression alterations in human cocaine use disorder 92%
- Distinguishing clinical and genetic risk factors for suicidal ideation and behavior in a diverse hospital population 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distributed genetic architecture across the hippocampal formation implies common neuropathology across major brain disorders 93%
- Single nuclei transcriptomics in human and non-human primate striatum implicates neuronal DNA damage and proinflammatory signaling in opioid use disorder 92%
- Mitochondrial complex I deficiency stratifies idiopathic Parkinson's disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain Extracellular Matrix implications in multiple neurological disorders are revealed through a meta-analysis of transcriptional changes 91%
- Intersecting impact of CAG repeat and Huntingtin knockout in stem cell-derived cortical neurons 91%
- Regional interneuron transcriptional changes reveal pathologic markers of disease progression in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.