The role of affect regulation and mentalizing in mediating the attachment-epistemic trust relationship. Differences between junior and senior students...Who is at risk?
Karagiannopoulou, E.; Lianos, P.; Andriopoulou, P.; Rentzios, C.; Fonagy, P.
Show abstract
Research on emotional factors and mental health in higher education has gained traction. Much attention has focused on first-year students as a potentially at-risk group, though some studies suggest that all students might face similar risks. This study examines differences between junior and senior undergraduates in terms of mentalizing, emotion regulation (ER), and psychological mindedness. These constructs relate to understanding ones own and others mental states, potentially mediating the relationship between attachment and epistemic trust (ET). The current study includes 460 undergraduate students, most of whom are female (96%). Results show that senior students score higher on reappraisal, certainty, and interest/curiosity compared to junior students. However, these factors did not mediate the relationship between anxious attachment orientation and ET. Certainty and interest/curiosity mediated the relationship between avoidant attachment orientation and ET, suggesting similar mediation patterns for junior and senior students. On the other hand, suppression and uncertainty/confusion were critical mediators in the relationship between insecure (anxious and avoidant) attachment orientations and epistemic trust. These findings are discussed within the framework of attachment and mentalizing literature, along with relevant connections to educational studies.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-Cultural Validation of Acculturation Measures: Expanding the East Asian Acculturation Framework for Global Applicability 95%
- Undergraduate students with and without mental health concerns have different perceptions of disclosing mental health challenges to instructors 95%
- Changes in hospital staff mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic: longitudinal results from the international COPE-CORONA study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Depression and loneliness during COVID-19 restrictions in the United States, and their associations with frequency of social and sexual connections 92%
- Mental health in higher-education students and non-students: evidence from a nationally representative panel study 90%
- Heterogeneity and heterotypic continuity of emotional and behavioral profiles across development 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Initial Validation of the Duke Misophonia Questionnaire 92%
- The measurement properties and acceptability of a new parent-infant bonding tool (‘Me and My Baby’) designed for use in a universal healthcare setting in the UK 92%
- ‘Kindness By Post’: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of A Participatory Public Mental Health Project 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the influence of parental anxiety on childhood anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Arab Emirates 94%
- A psychometric validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in community-dwelling older adults 93%
- Treatment provision for adults with ADHD during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study on patient and therapist experience with on-site sessions using face masks vs. telepsychiatric sessions 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.