Back

A Novel Explainable AI Method to Assess Associations between Temporal Patterns in Patient Trajectories and Adverse Outcome Risks: Analyzing Fitness as a Risk Factor of ADRD

Shao, Y.; Zamrini, E. Y.; Ahmed, A.; Cheng, Y.; Nelson, S. J.; Kokkinos, P.; Zeng-Treitler, Q.

2024-05-17 health informatics
10.1101/2024.05.17.24307541
Show abstract

We present a novel explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) method to assess the associations between the temporal patterns in the patient trajectories recorded in longitudinal clinical data and the adverse outcome risks, through explanations for a type of deep neural network model called Hybrid Value-Aware Transformer (HVAT) model. The HVAT models can learn jointly from longitudinal and non-longitudinal clinical data, and in particular can leverage the time-varying numerical values associated with the clinical codes or concepts within the longitudinal data for outcome prediction. The key component of the XAI method is the definitions of two derived variables, the temporal mean and the temporal slope, which are defined for the clinical concepts with associated time-varying numerical values. The two variables represent the overall level and the rate of change over time, respectively, in the trajectory formed by the values associated with the clinical concept. Two operations on the original values are designed for changing the values of the two derived variables separately. The effects of the two variables on the outcome risks learned by the HVAT model are calculated in terms of impact scores and impacts. Interpretations of the impact scores and impacts as being similar to those of odds ratios are also provided. We applied the XAI method to the study of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) as a risk factor of Alzheimers disease and related dementias (ADRD). Using a retrospective case-control study design, we found that each one-unit increase in the overall CRF level is associated with a 5% reduction in ADRD risk, while each one-unit increase in the changing rate of CRF over time is associated with a 1% reduction. A closer investigation revealed that the association between the changing rate of CRF level and the ADRD risk is nonlinear, or more specifically, approximately piecewise linear along the axis of the changing rate on two pieces: the piece of negative changing rates and the piece of positive changing rates.

Matching journals

1
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 9%
2.5× avg
2
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 39 published papers
Top 0.3%
32× avg
3
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) · based on 14 published papers
#1
76× avg
4
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 59%
7.5%
5
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Elsevier BV · based on 37 published papers
Top 1%
23× avg
6
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 36 published papers
Top 2%
14× avg
7
JAMIA Open
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 35 published papers
Top 3%
9.7× avg
8
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 53 published papers
Top 4%
5.9× avg
9
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 22 published papers
Top 1%
20× avg
10
Biology Methods and Protocols
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.3%
21× avg
11
JMIR Medical Informatics
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 16 published papers
Top 3%
14× avg
12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 8%
3.3× avg
13
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
Elsevier BV · based on 17 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
14
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 9%
2.0× avg
15
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Frontiers Media SA · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
19× avg
16
Patterns
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 1%
16× avg
17
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Elsevier BV · based on 25 published papers
Top 4%
6.4× avg
18
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 10%
2.4× avg
19
Frontiers in Digital Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 3%
9.5× avg
20
IEEE Access
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
17× avg
21
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
8.9× avg
22
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 41 published papers
Top 3%
6.5× avg
23
Heliyon
Elsevier BV · based on 57 published papers
Top 8%
3.6× avg
24
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
13× avg
25
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 29 published papers
Top 3%
7.5× avg
26
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 45 published papers
Top 9%
3.4× avg
27
Journal of Personalized Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 17 published papers
Top 1%
11× avg
28
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 135 published papers
Top 25%
0.8%
29
Sensors
MDPI AG · based on 18 published papers
Top 3%
5.4× avg
30
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Elsevier BV · based on 12 published papers
Top 1%
12× avg