Back

Supporting Self-management Through eHealth - Exploring the Needs, Challenges and Solutions in General Practice A Qualitative and Participatory Design Study

Djurtoft, C.; Sorensen, K.; Odgaard, C.; Hoegh, M.; Rathleff, M. S.; Johansen, S. K.

2024-05-21 pain medicine
10.1101/2024.05.17.24307464 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionDigital transformation and integration of eHealth solutions into chronic pain management faces significant challenges that have not yet been met. To realize the potential of eHealth solutions there is a need to understand the challenges, needs and care processes of eHealth into specific contexts and specific purposes. The objective of this study was to explore challenges, barriers, support needs, and visions experienced by patients and general practitioners (GPs) in the context of an eHealth solution designed for chronic pain management in general practice. MethodsThe study used action-research as a methodological framework. We conducted two future workshops involving eight patients living with chronic pain and seven GPs with clinical experience in managing chronic pain. Through case vignettes and inspiration cards, these workshops stimulated discussions and shared knowledge construction. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, separated by the groups, and were synthesized via a matrix analysis. ResultsThe analysis revealed five content summary themes: Theme 1--patients experience of challenges in life with pain; Theme 2--challenges in treating patients with chronic pain; Theme 3--patients suggestions for the structure of the eHealth solution; Theme 4--GP suggestions for the structure of the eHealth solution; and Theme 5--differences and similarities: Visions for an eHealth solution. The analysis generated several touchpoints and tension within the patient-physician encounter. ConclusionIn conclusion, these themes provide distinct narratives, offering valuable insights into the design objectives. Our study represents a significant advancement in developing personalized and innovative eHealth solutions for general practice, addressing key clinical challenges. PerspectiveRealizing the potential of eHealth solutions, these findings highlight both contrasting and shared viewpoints on design objectives, providing crucial insight into end-user perspectives for effective pain management. Additionally, the study underscores the importance of supported self-management and clinical communication in understanding each patients overall presentation within the healthcare system.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.3%
2
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.9%
5
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
7
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
8
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.6%
9
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
10
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
11
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
12
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
13
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
15
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
21
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
24
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
26
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%