Large-scale estimation of bacterial and archaeal DNA prevalence in metagenomes reveals biome-specific patterns
Eisenhofer, R.; Alberdi, A.; Woodcroft, B. J.
Show abstract
Metagenomes often contain many reads derived from eukaryotes. However, there is usually no reliable method for estimating the prevalence of non-microbial reads in a metagenome, forcing many analysis techniques to make the often-faulty assumption that all reads are microbial. For instance, the success of metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) recovery efforts is assessed by the number of reads mapped to recovered MAGs, a procedure which will underestimate the true fidelity if eukaryotic reads are present. Here we present "SingleM microbial_fraction" (SMF), a scalable algorithm that robustly estimates the number of bacterial and archaeal reads in a metagenome, and the average microbial genome size. SMF does not use eukaryotic reference genome data and can be applied to any Illumina metagenome. Based on SMF, we propose the "Domain-Adjusted Mapping Rate" (DAMR) as an improved metric to assess microbial genome recovery from metagenomes. We benchmark SMF on simulated and real data, and demonstrate how DAMRs can guide genome recovery. Applying SMF to 136,284 publicly available metagenomes, we report substantial variation in microbial fractions and biome-specific patterns of microbial abundance, providing insights into how microorganisms and eukaryotes are distributed across Earth. Finally, we show that substantial amounts of human host DNA sequence data have been deposited in public metagenome repositories, possibly counter to ethical directives that mandate screening of these reads prior to release. As the adoption of metagenomic sequencing continues to grow, we foresee SMF being a valuable tool for the appraisal of genome recovery efforts, and the recovery of global patterns of microorganism distribution.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- MAGNETO: an automated workflow for genome-resolved metagenomics 98%
- Long-read-resolved, ecosystem-wide exploration of nucleotide and structural microdiversity of lake bacterioplankton genomes 96%
- Genome-resolved metaproteomics decodes the microbial and viral contributions to coupled carbon and nitrogen cycling in river sediments 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improved eukaryotic detection compatible with large-scale automated analysis of metagenomes 97%
- Microbial context predicts SARS-CoV-2 prevalence in patients and the hospital built environment 95%
- Extensive diversity and rapid turnover of phage defense repertoires in cheese-associated bacterial communities 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- StrainGE: A toolkit to track and characterize low-abundance strains in complex microbial communities 96%
- Comparison of gene clustering criteria reveals intrinsic uncertainty in pangenome analyses 96%
- Functional and genetic markers of niche partitioning among enigmatic members of the human oral microbiome 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic evaluation of metatranscriptomic differential gene expression in silico, in vitro, and in vivo enables elucidation of inter-species cross-feeding 96%
- Growth phase estimation for abundant bacterial populations sampled longitudinally from human stool metagenomes. 95%
- Airborne eDNA captures three decades of ecosystem biodiversity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- DRAM for distilling microbial metabolism to automate the curation of microbiome function 97%
- Metalog: curated and harmonised contextual data for global metagenomics samples 95%
- Unveiling the Microbial Realm with VEBA 2.0: A modular bioinformatics suite for end-to-end genome-resolved prokaryotic, (micro)eukaryotic, and viral multi-omics from either short- or long-read sequencing 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.