Candidate Genes from an FDA-Approved Algorithm Fail to Predict Opioid Use Disorder Risk in Over 450,000 Veterans
Davis, C. N.; Jinwala, Z.; Hatoum, A. S.; Toikumo, S. I.; Agrawal, A.; Rentsch, C. T.; Edenberg, H. J.; Baurley, J. W.; Hartwell, E. E.; Crist, R. C.; Gray, J.; Justice, A. C.; Gelernter, J.; Kember, R. L.; Kranzler, H.
Show abstract
ImportanceRecently, the Food and Drug Administration gave pre-marketing approval to algorithm based on its purported ability to identify genetic risk for opioid use disorder. However, the clinical utility of the candidate genes comprising the algorithm has not been independently demonstrated. ObjectiveTo assess the utility of 15 variants in candidate genes from an algorithm intended to predict opioid use disorder risk. DesignThis case-control study examined the association of 15 candidate genetic variants with risk of opioid use disorder using available electronic health record data from December 20, 1992 to September 30, 2022. SettingElectronic health record data, including pharmacy records, from Million Veteran Program participants across the United States. ParticipantsParticipants were opioid-exposed individuals enrolled in the Million Veteran Program (n = 452,664). Opioid use disorder cases were identified using International Classification of Disease diagnostic codes, and controls were individuals with no opioid use disorder diagnosis. ExposuresNumber of risk alleles present across 15 candidate genetic variants. Main Outcome and MeasuresPredictive performance of 15 genetic variants for opioid use disorder risk assessed via logistic regression and machine learning models. ResultsOpioid exposed individuals (n=33,669 cases) were on average 61.15 (SD = 13.37) years old, 90.46% male, and had varied genetic similarity to global reference panels. Collectively, the 15 candidate genetic variants accounted for 0.4% of variation in opioid use disorder risk. The accuracy of the ensemble machine learning model using the 15 genes as predictors was 52.8% (95% CI = 52.1 - 53.6%) in an independent testing sample. Conclusions and RelevanceCandidate genes that comprise the approved algorithm do not meet reasonable standards of efficacy in predicting opioid use disorder risk. Given the algorithms limited predictive accuracy, its use in clinical care would lead to high rates of false positive and negative findings. More clinically useful models are needed to identify individuals at risk of developing opioid use disorder. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSHow well do candidate genes from an algorithm designed to predict risk of opioid use disorder, which recently received pre-marketing approval by the Food and Drug Administration, perform in a large, independent sample? FindingsIn a case-control study of over 450,000 individuals, the 15 genetic variants from candidate genes collectively accounted for 0.4% of the variation in opioid use disorder risk. In this independent sample, the SNPs predicted risk at a level of accuracy near random chance (52.8%). MeaningCandidate genes from the approved genetic risk algorithm do not meet standards of reasonable clinical efficacy in assessing risk of opioid use disorder.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-omic network analysis identifies dysregulated neurobiological pathways in opioid addiction 93%
- Novel insights into the common heritable liability to addiction: a multivariate genome-wide association study 92%
- Descriptives and genetic correlates of eating disorder diagnostic transitions and presumed remission in the Danish registry 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic liability for substance use associated with medical comorbidities in electronic health records of African- and European-ancestry individuals 94%
- Genome-wide analyses reveal novel opioid use disorder loci and genetic overlap with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression 93%
- Transcriptional signatures of fentanyl use in the mouse ventral tegmental area 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-Species Integration of Transcriptomic Effects of Tobacco and Nicotine Exposure Helps to Prioritize Genetic Effects on Human Tobacco Consumption 93%
- Ibrutinib as a Potential Therapeutic for Cocaine Use Disorder 93%
- Polygenic scores for tobacco use provide insights into systemic health risks in a diverse EHR-linked biobank in Los Angeles 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic underpinnings of the transition from alcohol consumption to alcohol use disorder: shared and unique genetic architectures in a cross-ancestry sample 91%
- Multivariate GWAS elucidates the genetic architecture of alcohol consumption and misuse, corrects biases, and reveals novel associations with disease 91%
- Interplay of ADHD polygenic liability with birth-related, somatic and psychosocial factors in ADHD - a nationwide study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging genome-wide data to investigate differences between opioid use vs. opioid dependence in 41,176 individuals from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium 95%
- Genome-wide association study and multi-trait analysis of opioid use disorder identifies novel associations in 639,709 individuals of European and African ancestry 94%
- Genome-wide association study of problematic opioid prescription use in 132,113 23andMe research participants of European ancestry 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.