Effect of Montelukast vs Placebo on Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients with COVID-19: The ACTIV-6 Randomized Clinical Trial
Rothman, R. L.; Stewart, T. G.; Mourad, A.; Boulware, D.; McCarthy, M. W.; Thicklin, F.; Garcia del Sol, I. T.; Garcia, J. L.; Bramante, C.; Shah, N. S.; Singh, U.; Williamson, J. C.; Rebolledo, P. A.; Jagannathan, P. C.; Schwasinger-Schmidt, T.; Ginde, A. A.; Castro, M.; Jayaweera, D.; Sulkowski, M.; Gentile, N.; McTigue, K.; Felker, G. M.; DeLong, A.; Wilder, R.; Collins, S.; Dunsmore, S. E.; Adam, S. J.; Hanna, G. J.; Shenkman, E.; Hernandez, A. F.; Naggie, S.; Lindsell, C. J.
Show abstract
ImportanceThe effect of montelukast in reducing symptom duration among outpatients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is uncertain. ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of montelukast compared with placebo in treating outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThe ACTIV-6 platform randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of repurposed medications in treating mild to moderate COVID-19. Between January 27, 2023, and June 23, 2023, 1250 participants [≥]30 years of age with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and [≥]2 acute COVID-19 symptoms for [≤]7 days, were included across 104 US sites to evaluate the use of montelukast. InterventionsParticipants were randomized to receive montelukast 10 mg once daily or matched placebo for 14 days. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was time to sustained recovery (defined as at least 3 consecutive days without symptoms). Secondary outcomes included time to death; time to hospitalization or death; a composite of hospitalization, urgent care visit, emergency department visit, or death; COVID clinical progression scale; and difference in mean time unwell. ResultsAmong participants who were randomized and received study drug, the median age was 53 years (IQR 42-62), 60.2% were female, 64.6% identified as Hispanic/Latino, and 56.3% reported [≥]2 doses of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Among 628 participants who received montelukast and 622 who received placebo, differences in time to sustained recovery were not observed (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.02; 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.92-1.12; P(efficacy) = 0.63]). Unadjusted median time to sustained recovery was 10 days (95% confidence interval 10-11) in both groups. No deaths were reported and 2 hospitalizations were reported in each group; 36 participants reported healthcare utilization events (a priori defined as death, hospitalization, emergency department/urgent care visit); 18 in the montelukast group compared with 18 in the placebo group (HR 1.01; 95% CrI 0.45-1.84; P(efficacy)=0.48). Five participants experienced serious adverse events (3 with montelukast and 2 with placebo). Conclusions and RelevanceAmong outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19, treatment with montelukast does not reduce duration of COVID-19 symptoms. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04885530).
Matching journals
The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of casirivimab and imdevimab, and sotrovimab during Delta variant surge: a prospective cohort study and comparative effectiveness randomized trial 93%
- Clinical Trial Evidence Supporting FDA Approval of Novel Therapeutic Agents Over Three Decades, 1995-2017: Cross-Sectional Analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Sarilumab in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19 95%
- Efficacy and safety of ensitrelvir in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19: the phase 2b part of a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 study 95%
- Safety and Efficacy of Pemivibart, a Long-Acting Monoclonal Antibody, for Prevention of Symptomatic COVID-19: Interim Results From the CANOPY Clinical Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy of Colchicine in Non-Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 97%
- Inhaled budesonide in the treatment of early COVID-19 illness: a randomised controlled trial 95%
- Namilumab or infliximab compared to standard of care in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (CATALYST): a phase 2 randomised adaptive trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.