Back

Effect of Montelukast vs Placebo on Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients with COVID-19: The ACTIV-6 Randomized Clinical Trial

Rothman, R. L.; Stewart, T. G.; Mourad, A.; Boulware, D.; McCarthy, M. W.; Thicklin, F.; Garcia del Sol, I. T.; Garcia, J. L.; Bramante, C.; Shah, N. S.; Singh, U.; Williamson, J. C.; Rebolledo, P. A.; Jagannathan, P. C.; Schwasinger-Schmidt, T.; Ginde, A. A.; Castro, M.; Jayaweera, D.; Sulkowski, M.; Gentile, N.; McTigue, K.; Felker, G. M.; DeLong, A.; Wilder, R.; Collins, S.; Dunsmore, S. E.; Adam, S. J.; Hanna, G. J.; Shenkman, E.; Hernandez, A. F.; Naggie, S.; Lindsell, C. J.

2024-05-18 infectious diseases
10.1101/2024.05.16.24307115 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceThe effect of montelukast in reducing symptom duration among outpatients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is uncertain. ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of montelukast compared with placebo in treating outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThe ACTIV-6 platform randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of repurposed medications in treating mild to moderate COVID-19. Between January 27, 2023, and June 23, 2023, 1250 participants [≥]30 years of age with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and [≥]2 acute COVID-19 symptoms for [≤]7 days, were included across 104 US sites to evaluate the use of montelukast. InterventionsParticipants were randomized to receive montelukast 10 mg once daily or matched placebo for 14 days. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was time to sustained recovery (defined as at least 3 consecutive days without symptoms). Secondary outcomes included time to death; time to hospitalization or death; a composite of hospitalization, urgent care visit, emergency department visit, or death; COVID clinical progression scale; and difference in mean time unwell. ResultsAmong participants who were randomized and received study drug, the median age was 53 years (IQR 42-62), 60.2% were female, 64.6% identified as Hispanic/Latino, and 56.3% reported [≥]2 doses of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Among 628 participants who received montelukast and 622 who received placebo, differences in time to sustained recovery were not observed (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.02; 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.92-1.12; P(efficacy) = 0.63]). Unadjusted median time to sustained recovery was 10 days (95% confidence interval 10-11) in both groups. No deaths were reported and 2 hospitalizations were reported in each group; 36 participants reported healthcare utilization events (a priori defined as death, hospitalization, emergency department/urgent care visit); 18 in the montelukast group compared with 18 in the placebo group (HR 1.01; 95% CrI 0.45-1.84; P(efficacy)=0.48). Five participants experienced serious adverse events (3 with montelukast and 2 with placebo). Conclusions and RelevanceAmong outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19, treatment with montelukast does not reduce duration of COVID-19 symptoms. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04885530).

Published in JAMA Network Open (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
JAMA Network Open · published here
127 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
3
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.0%
4
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.9%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
7
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
9
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
10
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
13
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
15
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
16
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
19
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%
24
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
25
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%