Test Retest Reliability of Meta Analytic Networks During Naturalistic Viewing
Kroell, J.-P.; Friedrich, P.; Li, X.; Nurislamova, Y.; Kraljevic, N.; Geiger, A.; Mans, J.; Waite, L.; Caspers, J.; Qian, X.; Chee, M. W.; Zhou, J. H.; Eickhoff, S.; Weis, S.
Show abstract
Functional connectivity analyses have given considerable insights into human brain function and organization. As research moves towards clinical application, test-retest reliability has become a main focus of the field. So far, the majority of studies have relied on resting-state paradigms to examine brain connectivity, based on its low demand and ease of implementation. However, the reliability of resting-state measures is mostly moderate, potentially due to its unconstrained nature. Recently, naturalistic viewing paradigms have gained popularity because they probe the human brain under more ecologically valid conditions, thereby possibly increasing reliability. Therefore, we here compared the reliability of graph metrics extracted from resting-state and naturalistic viewing in functional networks, across two sessions. We show that naturalistic viewing can increase reliability over resting-state, but that its effect varies between stimuli and networks. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the effect of naturalistic viewing differs between two cohorts with Asian and European cultural backgrounds. Taken together, our study encourages the use of naturalistic viewing to increase reliability, but emphasizes the need to carefully select the appropriate stimulus and network for the respective research question.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Act Natural: Functional Connectivity from Naturalistic Stimuli fMRI Outperforms Resting-State in Predicting Brain Activity 97%
- Measurement Reliability for Individual Differences in Multilayer Network Dynamics: Cautions and Considerations 96%
- Conscientiousness associated with efficiency of the salience/ventral attention network: Replication in three samples using individualized parcellation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inter- and intra-subject similarity in network functional connectivity across a full narrative movie 98%
- Network and State Specificity in Connectivity-Based Predictions of Individual Behavior 97%
- Every individual makes a difference: A trinity derived from linking individual brain morphometry, connectivity and mentalising ability 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Computerized physical and cognitive training improves the functional architecture of the brain in adults with Down Syndrome: a network science EEG study 96%
- A Mixed-Modeling Framework for Whole-Brain Dynamic Network Analysis 96%
- Test-Retest Reliability of Dynamic Functional Connectivity Parameters for a Two-State Model 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence for a Compensatory Relationship between Left- and Right-Lateralized Brain Networks 96%
- Intrinsic functional connectivity among memory networks does not predict individual differences in narrative recall 95%
- Atlas for the Lateralized Visuospatial Attention Networks (ALANs): Insights from fMRI and Network Analyses 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.