Back

Partitioning biota along the Elbe River estuary: where are the community transitions?

Branoff, B.; Grueterich, L.; Wilson, M.; Tobias-Hunefeldt, S. P.; Saadaoui, Y.; Mittmann-Goetsch, J.; Neiske, F.; Lexmond, F.; Becker, J.; Grossart, H.-P.; Porada, P.; Streit, W.; Eschenbach, A.; Kutzbach, L.; Jensen, K.

2024-05-14 ecology
10.1101/2024.05.13.593883 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Estuarine zonation and community assemblages are frequently correlated with salinity, although the extent or nature of this correlation varies considerably among the published studies. While a smooth transition in biological communities is often conceptualized in association with estuarine fresh, brackish, and marine conditions, many studies have shown more distinct communities and the altogether absence of a brackish community. We explore these viewpoints in light of plant observations and soil and aquatic microbial analyses from permanent plots established on the Elbe River Estuary of northern Germany. Generally, two distinct communities were observed, a polyhaline assemblage towards the mouth of the system, and another that was associated with both the fresh and brackish mesohaline regimes further upriver. This was most pronounced among plant and soil bacteria communities, while aquatic 16S assemblages reflected little distinction at all. The proportion of marine classified taxa declined from the mouth to upriver and suggests that while the transition from marine to brackish or fresh vegetation falls within the sampled area, the same transition for microbial taxa could not be observed and may be further upriver. Thus, although we were able to identify two distinct communities, the "limit" of marine taxa was only evident for vegetation. While tidal and weather-related hydrology, as well as soil properties were also influential in distinguishing the communities, much of the variance remains unexplained. Further sampling, classification, and partitioning is necessary to determine the origin and/or autochthonous habitat, if any, for the Elbe River estuarine taxa. Geographic boundsbottom left: 53.556216{degrees}N, 8.824398{degrees}E top right: 53.917760 {degrees}N, 10.155669 {degrees}E

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
23.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.0%
4
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.5%
6
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
7
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
9
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
11
Freshwater Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
15
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
17
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
21
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
22
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%