Mismatch repair gene specifications to the ACMG/AMP classification criteria: Consensus recommendations from the InSiGHT ClinGen Hereditary Colorectal Cancer / Polyposis Variant Curation Expert Panel
Plazzer, J. P.; Macrae, F.; Yin, X.; Thompson, B. A.; Farrington, S. M.; Currie, L.; Lagerstedt-Robinson, K.; Frederiksen, J. H.; van Overeem Hansen, T.; Graversen, L.; Frayling, I. M.; Akagi, K.; Yamamoto, G.; Al-Mulla, F.; Ferber, M. J.; Martins, A.; Genuardi, M.; Kohonen-Corish, M.; Baert-Desurmont, S.; Spurdle, A. B.; Capella, G.; Pineda, M.; Woods, M. O.; Rasmussen, L. J.; Heinen, C. D.; Scott, R. J.; Tops, C. M.; Greenblatt, M. S.; Dominguez-Valentin, M.; Ognedal, E.; Borras, E.; Leung, S. Y.; Mahmood, K.; Holinski-Feder, E.; Laner, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundIt is known that gene- and disease-specific evidence domains can potentially improve the capability of the ACMG/AMP classification criteria to categorize pathogenicity for variants. We aimed to include gene-disease-specific clinical, predictive, and functional domain specifications to the ACMG/AMP criteria with respect to MMR genes. MethodsStarting with the original criteria (InSiGHT criteria) developed by the InSiGHT Variant Interpretation Committee, we systematically addressed specifications to the ACMG/AMP criteria to enable more comprehensive pathogenicity assessment within the ClinGen VCEP framework, resulting in an MMR gene-specific ACMG/AMP criteria. ResultsA total of 19 criteria were specified, 9 were considered not applicable and there were 35 variations of strength of the evidence. A pilot set of 48 variants was tested using the new MMR gene-specific ACMG/AMP criteria. Most variants remained unaltered, as compared to the previous InSiGHT criteria; however, an additional four variants of uncertain significance were reclassified to P/LP or LB by the MMR gene-specific ACMG/AMP criteria framework. ConclusionThe MMR gene-specific ACMG/AMP criteria have proven feasible for implementation, are consistent with the original InSiGHT criteria, and enable additional combinations of evidence for variant classification. This study provides a strong foundation for implementing gene-disease-specific knowledge and experience, and could also hold immense potential in a clinical setting.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.