Back

Mismatch repair gene specifications to the ACMG/AMP classification criteria: Consensus recommendations from the InSiGHT ClinGen Hereditary Colorectal Cancer / Polyposis Variant Curation Expert Panel

Plazzer, J. P.; Macrae, F.; Yin, X.; Thompson, B. A.; Farrington, S. M.; Currie, L.; Lagerstedt-Robinson, K.; Frederiksen, J. H.; van Overeem Hansen, T.; Graversen, L.; Frayling, I. M.; Akagi, K.; Yamamoto, G.; Al-Mulla, F.; Ferber, M. J.; Martins, A.; Genuardi, M.; Kohonen-Corish, M.; Baert-Desurmont, S.; Spurdle, A. B.; Capella, G.; Pineda, M.; Woods, M. O.; Rasmussen, L. J.; Heinen, C. D.; Scott, R. J.; Tops, C. M.; Greenblatt, M. S.; Dominguez-Valentin, M.; Ognedal, E.; Borras, E.; Leung, S. Y.; Mahmood, K.; Holinski-Feder, E.; Laner, A.

2024-05-14 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.05.13.24307108 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIt is known that gene- and disease-specific evidence domains can potentially improve the capability of the ACMG/AMP classification criteria to categorize pathogenicity for variants. We aimed to include gene-disease-specific clinical, predictive, and functional domain specifications to the ACMG/AMP criteria with respect to MMR genes. MethodsStarting with the original criteria (InSiGHT criteria) developed by the InSiGHT Variant Interpretation Committee, we systematically addressed specifications to the ACMG/AMP criteria to enable more comprehensive pathogenicity assessment within the ClinGen VCEP framework, resulting in an MMR gene-specific ACMG/AMP criteria. ResultsA total of 19 criteria were specified, 9 were considered not applicable and there were 35 variations of strength of the evidence. A pilot set of 48 variants was tested using the new MMR gene-specific ACMG/AMP criteria. Most variants remained unaltered, as compared to the previous InSiGHT criteria; however, an additional four variants of uncertain significance were reclassified to P/LP or LB by the MMR gene-specific ACMG/AMP criteria framework. ConclusionThe MMR gene-specific ACMG/AMP criteria have proven feasible for implementation, are consistent with the original InSiGHT criteria, and enable additional combinations of evidence for variant classification. This study provides a strong foundation for implementing gene-disease-specific knowledge and experience, and could also hold immense potential in a clinical setting.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.