Validation of a Machine Learning Diagnostic Tool for the Prediction of Sepsis and Critical Illness
Bhargava, A.; Lopez-Espina, C.; Schmalz, L.; Khan, S.; Watson, G. L.; Urdiales, D.; Updike, L.; Kurtzman, N.; Dagan, A.; Doodlesack, A.; Stenson, B.; Sarma, D.; Reseland, E.; Lee, J. H.; Kravitz, M.; Antkowiak, P. S.; Shvilkina, T.; Espinosa, A.; Halalau, A.; Demarco, C.; Davila, F.; Davila, H.; Sims, M.; Maddens, N.; Berghea, R.; Smith, S.; Palagiri, A. V.; Ezekiel, C.; Sadaka, F.; Iyer, K.; Crisp, M.; Azad, S.; Oke, V.; Friederich, A.; Syed, A.; Gosai, F.; Chawla, L.; Evans, N.; Thomas, K.; Malkani, R.; Patel, R.; Mayer, S.; Ali, F.; Raghavakurup, L.; Tafa, M.; Singh, S.; Raouf, S.; Zhao, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundSepsis is a life-threatening condition that demands prompt treatment for improved patient outcomes. Its heterogenous presentation makes early detection challenging, highlighting the need for effective risk assessment tools. Artificial Intelligence (AI) models have the potential to accurately identify septic patients, but none have previously been FDA-authorized for commercial use. This study outlines the development and validation of the Sepsis ImmunoScore, the first FDA-authorized AI-based software designed to identify patients at risk of sepsis. MethodIn this prospective study, adult patients (18+) suspected of infection, as indicated by a blood culture order, were enrolled from five U.S. institutions between April 2017 and July 2022. The participants were divided into an algorithm development cohort (n=2,366), an internal validation cohort (n=393), and an external validation cohort (n=698). The primary endpoint was the presence of sepsis (Sepsis-3) within 24 hours of test initiation. Secondary endpoints included hospital length of stay, ICU admission within 24 hours, mechanical ventilation use within 24 hours, vasopressor use within 24 hours, and in-hospital mortality. ResultsThe Sepsis ImmunoScore demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy, with an AUC of 0.85 (0.83-0.87) in the derivation cohort, 0.80 (0.74-0.86) in internal validation, and 0.81 (0.77- 0.86) in external validation. The score was categorized into four risk levels for sepsis with corresponding likelihood ratios: low (0.1), medium (0.5), high (2.1), and very high (8.3). These risk categories also predicted in-hospital mortality: low (0.0%), medium (1.9%), high (8.7%), and very high (18.2%) in the external validation cohort. Similar trends were observed for other metrics, such as hospital length of stay, ICU utilization, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressor use. ConclusionsThe Sepsis ImmunoScore demonstrated high accuracy for identification and prediction of sepsis and critical illness that could enable prompt identification of patients at high risk of sepsis and adverse outcomes, potentially improving clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. DescriptionSepsis is a life-threatening acute condition that requires accurate and rapid identification to guide proper treatment. This study outlines the development and validation of the first FDA-authorized AI-based software to identify patients at risk of having sepsis.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a cellular host response test as an early diagnostic for sepsis 95%
- Application of the Sepsis-3 criteria to describe sepsis epidemiology in the AmsterdamUMCdb intensive care dataset 95%
- A Sepsis Treatment Algorithm to Improve Early Antibiotic De-escalation While Maintaining Adequacy of Coverage (Early-IDEAS): A Prospective Observational Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Predictive Model to Identify Complicated Clostridiodes difficile Infection 90%
- Sex and gender differences in COVID testing, hospital admission, presentation, and drivers of severe outcomes in the DC/Maryland region 89%
- Diagnostic utility of a Ferritin-to-Procalcitonin Ratio to differentiate patients with COVID-19 from those with Bacterial Pneumonia: A multicenter study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- International multi-cohort analysis identifies novel framework for quantifying immune dysregulation in critical illness: results of the SUBSPACE consortium 90%
- A consensus Covid-19 immune signature combines immuno-protection with discrete sepsis-like traits associated with poor prognosis 89%
- Early Anakinra Treatment for COVID-19 Guided by Urokinase Plasminogen Receptor 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Calprotectin as a sepsis diagnostic marker in critical care: a retrospective observational study 95%
- Machine learning vs. traditional regression analysis for fluid overload prediction in the ICU 92%
- AKI Risk Score (AKI-RiSc): Developing an Interpretable Clinical Score for Early Identification of Acute Kidney Injury for Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immune Profiling Panel: a proof of concept study of a new multiplex molecular tool to assess the immune status of critically-ill patients 91%
- The Activin/Follistatin-axis is severely deregulated in COVID-19 and independently associated with in-hospital mortality 89%
- Excessive matrix metalloproteinase-1 and hyperactivation of endothelial cells occurred in COVID-19 patients and were associated with the severity of COVID-19 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.